Skip to content
Government Federal, Political

Four-in-five want PwC banned from new government contracts

The Australia Institute 2 mins read
Four-in-five Australians (79%) want consulting firm PwC banned from receiving new government work, including nearly half who back a permanent ban, according to new research from the Australia Institute.

Just 2% did not think PwC should be banned from government work, while 19% did not know or were not sure, according to the nationally representative sample of 1002 people between June 6 and 9, 2023.

Of those surveyed, 45% thought the ban should be permanent while the remainder backed PwC being banned for at least some period of time, either less than two years (5%), between two and five years (12%), or between five and 10 years (16%).

“There is overwhelming public support for PwC to face serious consequences for its gross breach of integrity and trust,” said Bill Browne, Director of the Australia Institute’s Democracy & Accountability Program.

“The consequences for PwC’s abuse of public trust cannot be limited to when the political and media heat is on, but must be long-lasting to show that this behaviour will not be tolerated.

“The consulting firm has shown it cannot be trusted to continue receiving government work that can and should be performed by public servants,” said Mr Browne.

A permanent ban on PwC receiving government work was the single most popular response across all voting intentions:
  • One Nation (59%), the Greens (55%), Independent/Other (55%), the Coalition (43%) and Labor (39%).

The findings build on previous Australia Institute polling that showed:
  • 79% agreed that public servants should have the skills and capacity to do work being outsourced to consultants
  • 72% thought the $1 billion spent by the federal government on consultants was too much and 64% thought the money would be better spending hiring and training public servants
  • 85% agreed that consultants should be required to answer questions about their work when requested by parliament or other inquiries 

The Australia Institute is a member of the Australian Polling Council. The polling methodology, long disclosure statement and margin of error for polling questions are included in the appendix of the report.

Contact details:

Georgie Moore
Horton Advisory
0477 779 928


More from this category

  • Immigration, Political
  • 11/12/2023
  • 14:52
Sustainable Population Australia

Immigration package is unsustainable and misleads the public

Too little too late: immigration tweaks welcome but results will be far from sustainable SPA Media Release, 11th December 2023 Sustainable Population Australia (SPA) says that, while some aspects of the migration reform package are welcome and long overdue, it falls short in reducing migration to a sustainable level. Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil is misleading the Australian people in claiming that these reforms will bring us back to a ‘normal’ and ‘sustainable’ level of population growth, says SPA president Ms Jenny Goldie. “Immigration before the pandemic was in no way sustainable. It was elevated from 2005 by the Howard…

  • Political, Union
  • 11/12/2023
  • 10:21
Unions NSW

Unions NSW embraces migration reforms, but more must be done

The Government’s new skilled visa framework makes it easier for migrant workers to leave exploitative employers and provides clearer pathways to permanent residency, but to fight exploitation the restriction on hours worked by international students must be lifted, according to Unions NSW.Dependency on employers to maintain migration status has been a primary driver of migrant exploitation, Mark Morey, Secretary of Unions NSW said."Ensuring migrant workers can leave unscrupulous employers is a game changer. We routinely see migrant workers put their physical and mental health at risk because they are terrified that reporting their employers could result in them losing their…

  • Environment, Political
  • 11/12/2023
  • 08:59
Solutions for Climate Australia

Abatement of fossil fuel pollution is not a ‘goalkeeper’ if the corporate goalkeepers always let pollution through

At the global climate negotiations in Dubai, Australia's Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the so-called ‘abatement’ of climate pollution from burning fossil fuels - coal, gas and oil - was like a ‘goalkeeper’ that was a necessary line of defence to stop climate pollution heating the world. The Minister’s speech came during intense talks to break a deadlock at the COP 28 meeting on a commitment to phase-out fossil fuels. "We were startled by Minister Bowen’s defence of so-called ‘abatement’ of pollution. The reality on the ground is that there are now increasing numbers of frankly bullshit projects…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time your distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.