Skip to content
Building Construction, Government NSW

$75,000 less to build a home closer to Sydney CBD

NSW Treasury 2 mins read

Building in and close to Sydney’s central business district (CBD) can save up to $75,000 in infrastructure-related costs per home, new research shows.

NSW Productivity Commissioner Peter Achterstraat AM today released Building more homes where infrastructure costs less, the second in a series of papers that considers how NSW can use evidence to plan for new homes in the right locations and leverage Sydney’s existing infrastructure.

“At least 550,000 new homes are needed across Sydney by 2041. In this housing affordability crisis, it’s more important than ever to make sure new housing is built in the right areas and that we make the most of existing infrastructure,” Mr Achterstraat said.

“This paper investigates the costs of building across Greater Sydney and finds that the economic costs of growth, varies from $40,000 to $114,000 per home, with the lowest cost in areas near the CBD and increasing significantly moving north, south, and west.

“Building up in existing areas is cheaper because much of the necessary infrastructure, such as roads, public transport, schools, utilities, and open space, is already in place. More homes close to jobs also means shorter travel times.”

The paper follows the Building more homes where people want to live paper, released by the NSW Productivity Commission in May. which tallied the benefits of increasing housing in high-demand areas across Sydney, instead of pushing new homes further away.

“Our previous paper showed the Eastern Suburbs, North Shore, inner city, and Inner West have the greatest unmet demand when it comes to where people want to live. This paper suggests these areas also have the most existing capacity and are the most cost-effective areas to build in,” Mr Achterstraat said.

“Put simply, more housing in the right places, where people want to live, will improve affordability, reduce infrastructure costs, and limit the burden on taxpayers.”

The infrastructure costs considered in this paper include:

  • the economic costs, or impacts on individuals, of road congestion
  • the economic costs, or impacts on individuals, of crowding on trains
  • the costs of upgrading schools to take on new students
  • the costs of new water and wastewater connections
  • the purchase or contribution towards land for open space.

These two housing papers are part of a series that focuses on evidence-based decision-making in planning. 

To read the report, please go to https://www.productivity.nsw.gov.au/building-more-homes-where-infrastructure-costs-less

Media

More from this category

  • Building Construction
  • 23/01/2026
  • 00:41
IperionX

IperionX Receives Prototype Purchase Order for U.S. Army Heavy Ground Combat Systems

CHARLOTTE, N.C., Jan. 22, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- IperionX Limited (IperionX) (NASDAQ: IPX, ASX: IPX) has received a US$0.3 million prototype purchase order from American Rheinmetall for the production of 700 lightweight titanium components for U.S. Army heavy ground combat systems. This initial purchase order has the potential to lead to a significantly larger agreement upon successful delivery of this initial scope of work.The components will be manufactured in the United States using 100% recycled titanium feedstock, produced through IperionX’s patented Hydrogen Assisted Metallothermic Reduction (HAMR™) and Hydrogen Sintering and Phase Transformation (HSPT™) technologies. These technologies enable the domestic production…

  • Building Construction
  • 21/01/2026
  • 23:11
Copeland

Copeland Advances AI and Digital Strategy with Acquisition of Bueno Analytics

Acquisition integrates advanced SaaS capabilities to deliver smarter, data‑driven HVAC and cold chain solutions ST. LOUIS–BUSINESS WIRE– Copeland, a global provider of compression technologies…

  • Contains:
  • Building Construction, Foreign Affairs Trade
  • 21/01/2026
  • 10:38
Building Products Industry Council

Anti-dumping measures ‘essential’ to ensure a fair playing field for Australia’s building products industry

Allowing dumped building product imports to continue unabated will wipe out local businesses and destabilise the market, a peak industry body has warned. Rejecting claims by the Master Builders Association (MBA) that proposed anti-dumping duties on cheap building product imports would drive up housing costs, the Building Products Industry Council (BPIC) said the duties are applied only when imports are proven to be sold below their normal overseas value. "Anti-dumping duties don't push prices up; they restore fair competition,” BPIC Executive Officer Rodger Hills said. “They help to buffer the Australian construction sector from overseas interests intent on destroying the…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.