Skip to content
Indigenous, Political

Monash expert: Voice to Parliament referendum date set

Monash University 2 mins read

A Monash University expert in human rights law who specialises in Indigenous legal rights is available to comment on the referendum date and what this means for the campaign. 

Professor Paula Gerber, Monash Faculty of Law
Contact: +61 410 596 494 or paula.gerber@monash.edu
Read more of Professor Gerber’s commentary at Monash Lens 

The following can be attributed to Professor Gerber: 

“Now that we have the date for the referendum, we can expect the Yes and No campaigns to ramp up their efforts to sway undecided voters. Through all the noise, it is going to be important to stay focused on the facts; what are we being asked to vote on and how will the outcome be determined.  

“The only way the Constitution can be amended is if a majority of electors across the country approve the change and if a majority of states approve the change. This requirement for a ‘double majority’ means that for the Voice referendum to be successful, half of the national electoral roll must vote ‘Yes’ and 4 of the 6 states must also have majorities. 

“There are three aspects to the proposal – recognising that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are the First Peoples of Australia; establishing a body through which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples can make representations to Parliament and the Executive; and giving Parliament the ultimate authority to determine how the Voice will function.

“In a regular election we decide which candidates we want and number our preferences accordingly. Referendums are different. To indicate our preference, we must write the word ‘yes’ or ‘no’. The Australian Electoral Commission has indicated that they will accept that a tick shows an intention to vote ‘yes’, but will not accept that a ‘x’ demonstrates an intention to vote ‘no’. 

“On 14 October 2023, it is our civic responsibility to make an informed decision about the referendum question. There are just over six weeks to seek out information about the proposed constitutional change, and there are many reliable resources you can turn to for this information including, voice.gov.au and the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law.”

For more Monash media stories visit our news & events site: monash.edu/news 

For any other topics on which you may be seeking expert comment, contact the Monash University Media Unit on +61 3 9903 4840 or media@monash.edu

More from this category

  • Political
  • 13/09/2024
  • 13:06
Susan McKinnon Foundation

SA’s experience of truth in political advertising at odds with concerns: report

South Australia’s truth in political advertising (TiPA) laws enjoy widespread support among the state’s political establishment, contrasting with concerns raised about the prospect of TiPA laws in other jurisdictions, according to new research supported by the Susan McKinnon Foundation.The study involved conducting in-depth interviews with a range of current and former MPs (including premiers and ministers), party officials, electoral commissioners, and civil society organisations in South Australia and other jurisdictions to gain insights about TiPA laws. (See full list below).SA participants noted TiPA laws had undoubtedly changed the electoral campaigning, with state party directors working with lawyers to closely scrutinise…

  • Agriculture Farming Rural, Political
  • 11/09/2024
  • 14:11
Farmers for Climate Action

Farmers send message to Parliament: We want a clean future

Farmers from all over Queensland are returning home after sending a clear message to politicians and industry Queensland Parliament House: We want a clean…

  • Contains:
  • Finance Investment, Political
  • 11/09/2024
  • 10:59
Super Members Council

Coalition urged to ditch ‘deeply concerning’ push to ask mums to raid retirement savings

The Coalition’s support for paying super on Commonwealth Parental Leave Pay is very welcome - but its bid to make it optional undermines the whole policy intent of boosting the retirement savings of new mums and is a concerning departure from bipartisan principles of universality and compulsion. The cash-out proposal sends a worrying message to mums that they should sacrifice their future financial security to meet daily living costs – exacerbating women’s retirement poverty risk. Super Members Council CEO Misha Schubert said the organisation had urged the Coalition to reverse the policy. The proposal, introduced as amendments to the Bill,…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.