Skip to content
Taxation

Growing number of micro-taxes risks productivity growth

Productivity Commission 2 mins read

The rise of industry levies – narrowly applied, sector-specific taxes – is creating an increasingly complex and inefficient tax system that risks limiting productivity growth, according to Productivity Commission research released today.

The report finds that the number of these industry levies has quietly grown from 26 to 248 since 1980 to become the ‘long tail’ of Australia’s tax system, collecting less than 2% of overall tax revenue.

“Without anyone noticing, these micro-taxes have compounded into a bureaucratic ‘Levyathan’. Limiting their growth in favour of more efficient taxes is a simple, actionable reform that could make a material difference to productivity growth,” said Deputy Chair Dr Alex Robson.

Levies were originally introduced in the agriculture sector to raise funds for activities that benefit producers, but they are now being imposed by policymakers on a wide range of industries, in some cases as a way of simply raising general tax revenue.

While many levies are nominally collected to cover the cost of government regulation or mitigate environmental costs, these goals could often be pursued more effectively and efficiently through the broader tax system.

“Taxes work best when they are simple and efficient – but many industry levies are relatively expensive to collect, unnecessarily distort business activity and waste the time and resources of business and government,” said Dr Robson. 

The report highlights some startling examples of this inefficiency, including a list of 70 agencies around Australia involved in administrating or collecting industry levies and a stocktake of levies ranging from the billion-dollar Major Bank Levy to the $25.62 in revenue raised from levies on wild goat carcasses in 2022.

The analysis raises concerns that policymakers may be using levies as a politically expedient way of raising additional revenue that can be managed by an individual portfolio minister or department, with little regard for the impact they may have on the tax system as a whole.

“The cost of levies is almost invisible to the average taxpayer – people notice when income taxes rise, but no-one appears to notice when a levy is passed on by their insurance provider. It is little wonder then that policymakers might see a new levy as a good way to raise revenue even when better policy options might be available,” said Dr Robson.

The report presents a rigorous, straightforward framework for determining when a new levy can be justified.

“If governments can’t restore policy discipline to the design and implementation of these levies, our chance of a more efficient tax system that fosters productivity growth risks death by a thousand micro-taxes.”

When released, this publication can be accessed from the Commission’s website at www.pc.gov.au.

[END]

 


About us:

Productivity Commission – Providing independent research and advice to Government on economic, social and environmental issues affecting the welfare of Australians.


Contact details:

Simon Kinsmore – 02 6240 3330 / media@pc.gov.au

Media

More from this category

  • Government Federal, Taxation
  • 02/09/2024
  • 07:50
Australian Taxation Office

Avoid a tax time shock

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is giving taxpayers some simple steps to help avoid an unexpected tax billnext tax time. Assistant Commissioner Rob Thomson said there are many reasons that a taxpayer may end up with a bill attax time. ‘There are a number of factors that impact your tax assessment. In simple terms, if you don’t receive a refund orbill, it means you’ve paid the correct amount of tax throughout the year. If you receive a bill, it may mean youdidn’t pay enough – this can be for a number of reasons,’ Mr Thomson said. There are simple steps…

  • Government Federal, Taxation
  • 21/08/2024
  • 10:48
Australian Taxation Office

Deceptive duo destined for jail

A former tax agent and his client have been sentenced to a combined 10 years and 6 months in jail forfraudulently claiming tax refunds and intentionally avoiding paying income tax, contrary to section 134.2(1) of the Criminal Code (Cth). Banned tax agentRavindra Narayan from Melbourne was sentenced to 5 years and 6 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 9 months. Business owner Duane Saltmer from Townsville was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months. The pair dishonestly gained a financial advantage of over $4 million through refund fraud…

  • Finance Investment, Taxation
  • 19/08/2024
  • 08:00
Tax Practitioners Board

Federal Court imposes highest civil penalty of $1,800,000 in TPB matter

The Federal Court has handed down the highest total civil penalty for a Tax Practitioner Board (TPB) application against Sydney unregistered preparer, Jaydn Van Dyke. Mr Van Dyke was issued with a $1,800,000 penalty for 3,300 separate contraventions of the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (TASA) when he prepared and lodged income tax returns, for a fee, while not a registered tax agent with the TPB. The Federal Court also ordered Mr Van Dyke to pay the TPB’s costs and permanently restrained him from providing tax agent services for a fee or other reward, whilenot a registered tax agent. If…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.