Skip to content
Political, Taxation

High income earners, Coalition voters among those backing Stage 3 redesign

The Australia Institute 2 mins read

Media release | Wednesday, 31 January 2024

About half of Australia’s highest income earners on more than $200,000 back a redesign of the  Stage 3 tax cuts, according to new research from the Australia Institute. 

The survey shows nearly two-thirds of voters think it is more important to adapt policy to changing economic circumstances, even if it means breaking an election promise.

Just 16 per cent of people surveyed want the tax cuts kept in their current form, including a quarter of Coalition voters and a third of those on the highest incomes.

Key Points:

The Australia Institute surveyed a nationally representative sample of 1,017 Australians between January 23 and 29 January, 2024. The government announced its changes to the tax cuts on January 25.

  • Nearly six in ten Australians (58%) prefer for the Stage 3 tax cuts to be restructured so middle and low-income earners receive more.

  • Restructuring the stage 3 tax cuts is the most preferred option across all age groups, genders, voting intentions, and large states.

  • One in six (16%) Australians would rather keep the Stage 3 tax cuts in their current form than scrap or restructure them. This includes only one in four (25%) Coalition voters and one in three (32%) people earning over $200,000.

  • Two in three (65%) Australians believe that adapting economic policy to suit changing circumstances is more important, even if that means breaking an election promise.

    • Majority support was observed across all age groups, genders, voting intentions, and large states.

“The Morrison-era Stage 3 tax cuts are bad economic policy, and even voters on the highest incomes recognise that,” said Dr Richard Denniss, Executive Director of the Australia Institute.

“There is strong support for the Albanese government’s decision to restructure these cuts in the face of vastly different economic circumstances than when they were legislated.

“Our research demonstrates that restructuring Stage 3 is the preferred option among voters – regardless of how much they earn or who they vote for in an election.

“When Stage 3 was legislated in 2019, no one would have predicted a global pandemic, rising inflation and a cost-of-living crisis. Voters understand that things change.

“Two-thirds of people think it is more important to adapt the economic policy to suit the changing circumstances, even if that means going against an election promise.

“Australians need the government of the day to respond to our current economic realities. That is what the government has done.”

Dr Richard Denniss is appearing at the National Press Club TODAY, Wednesday 31 January, with Allegra Spender MP for ‘Australia’s Tax  Dilemma: The case for real reform.’

Media enquiries: Luciana Lawe Davies 0457 974 636

The Australia Institute is a member of the Australian Polling Council. The polling methodology, long disclosure statement and margin of error for polling questions are included in the appendix of the report.

Media

More from this category

  • Political
  • 17/12/2025
  • 15:45
Family First Party

How Australian Islam proved it is not a religion of peace

Statement by Family First National Director Lyle Shelton We need to face the fact that Islam in Australia is not a religion of peace.…

  • Contains:
  • Environment, Political
  • 16/12/2025
  • 15:53
Make Big Polluters Pay

Treasurer must levy big coal and gas corporations to fund climate disasters Make Big Polluters Pay

Climate disasters are projected to cost the federal budget $6.3 billion in the upcoming mid-year economic forecast this week. The Treasurer should follow public opinion and ensure coal and gas corporations responsible for most climate pollution pay for these costs, rather than forcing ordinary taxpayers to shoulder the burden, according to the Make Big Polluters Pay alliance. Climate disasters already cost the economy $38 billion each year, with households, communities, local governments and small businesses paying to recover from extreme weather. These impacts are also driving up insurance premiums, food prices and household bills. Deloitte projects disaster costs will exceed…

  • Contains:
  • Political, Property Real Estate
  • 16/12/2025
  • 06:00
Everybody's Home

The long list of trade-offs Aussies now make just to stay housed

Reducing energy use is the most common sacrifice Australians are making to afford their rent or mortgage, while many are limiting driving, skipping meals and delaying medical appointments, a new national survey has exposed.Everybody’s Home’s report‘Breaking Point’captures the results of a survey of more than 1,100 Australians. Of those surveyed: Half (50%) reduced their energy use including heating and cooling in the past year to cope with housing costs, making it the most common sacrifice Many respondents avoided the doctor or appointments (42%), reduced driving (38%), relied on credit cards or ‘buy now pay later’ (30%), skipped meals (28%) and…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.