Skip to content
Government NSW, Legal

Rushed majority verdicts a risk under proposed jury changes

Law Society of NSW 2 mins read

Monday, 22 January 2024

Rushed majority verdicts a risk under proposed jury changes

Proposed changes to jury laws designed to contribute to a fairer and more efficient justice system, include a proposal that risks reducing an important safeguard for majority verdicts.

President of the Law Society of NSW Brett McGrath said while the NSW Government’s Jury Amendment Bill 2023 proposes mostly common sense reforms, significant concerns remain.

“There can be few, if any, more important duties a citizen has than sitting on a jury. Yet a proposal to halve the amount of time before a jury can be excused from delivering a unanimous verdict represents an erosion of the importance of the jury’s role in our justice system,” Mr McGrath said.

“The stakes for both defendants and the state could not be higher than in a jury trial. Both the defendant’s liberty and the state’s interest in enforcing the law hang in the balance.”

At present, the Jury Act 1977 requires a criminal trial jury to sit for at least eight hours before a court can permit them to reach a ‘majority verdict’ (in which a single juror’s opposing view can be disregarded). Cases in which more than one juror cannot agree to a verdict, after appropriate judicial encouragement, result in ‘hung juries’.  

The Law Society’s submission to the Legislative Council’s Inquiry into the proposed changes to the Act advises that the rationale for the eight hour minimum has not changed since the measure was introduced in 2006.

“The then Attorney General Bob Debus was right when he told the Parliament that an eight hour minimum compels a jury to deliberate ‘for more than one court day’ before it’s directed that it can return a majority verdict,” Mr McGrath said.

“Given the grave consequences that can flow from a jury verdict, this period should remain the very least that a jury is required to consider often complex evidence, to deliver their decision unanimously. A mere four hours is insufficient.

“Judges have the discretion to require juries to deliberate for longer periods, but reducing the minimum time to four hours carries the risk that juries will rush to a verdict in cases where a person’s liberty is a stake. That outcome would be anathema to the right to a trial by jury.”

Mr McGrath welcomed the scrutiny of the Jury Amendment Bill by NSW Parliament’s upper house and the opportunity for the solicitors on the Law Society’s Criminal Law Committee to express their expert views on the legislation.

“The Law Society supports reforms that strike the right balance between an individual’s right to a fair trial and an efficient justice system, as do most of the amendments proposed in this Bill. We will also speak up when proposed reforms pose avoidable risks to the administration of justice,” Mr McGrath said.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Damien Smith | Director, Media and Public Relations
The Law Society of New South Wales

M: +61 417 788 947 | E: Damien.Smith@lawsociety.com.au  

Media

More from this category

  • General News, Legal
  • 27/02/2024
  • 11:04
UNSW Sydney

Australians in the dark on how companies track and target them, new report shows

A new report by the Consumer Policy Research Centre (CPRC) and UNSW Sydney reveals Australian consumers don’t understand how companies – including data brokers – track, target, and profile them using their personal information. The report includes findings from a survey by CPRC of 1,000 Australians about their understanding of privacy terms and attitudes to businesses collecting and sharing their personal information. The survey shows: Australians do not feel in control of their personal information. More than 70% believe they have very little or no control over what personal information online businesses share with other businesses. Only a third feel…

  • Environment, Legal
  • 27/02/2024
  • 00:05
Law Society of NSW

EMBARGO 0001 TUES, 27 FEB Climate change demands solicitors’ attention

Tuesday, 27 February 2024 Climate change demands solicitors’ attention EMBARGO: 0001 Tuesday, 27 February New guidance for NSW solicitors urges them to consider an…

  • Contains:
  • Culturally and linguistically diverse, Government NSW
  • 26/02/2024
  • 13:39
Department of Customer Service

Culturally and linguistically diverse communities to benefit from increased media focus

Monday, 26 February 2024 **In language media releases available via the attachments** NB: 20 translations available More communities across NSW will have access to up-to-date government information with an increased focus on multicultural and First Nations media outlets. More than 190 languages are spoken at home across NSW, including Mandarin, Arabic, Cantonese and Vietnamese. NSW also hosts almost 90 independent multicultural and Aboriginal publications and 210 radio programs, spoken in more than 56 languages, that are trusted sources of information for many linguistically and culturally diverse communities. As part of its commitment to greater inclusion across government services, the NSW…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.