Skip to content
International News, Political

Monash expert: Russian election (15-17 March)

Monash University 2 mins read

Ahead of Russia’s presidential election, 15 March, a Monash University expert is available to discuss what the election could mean for Russia, and globally. 

 

PhD candidate Alasdair McCallum, School of Social Sciences, Politics and International Relations, Faculty of Arts, Monash University

Contact: +61 427 856 007 or alasdair.mccallum@monash.edu 

Read more of Mr McCallum’s commentary at Monash Lens

 

The following can be attributed to Mr McCallum:

 

“Vladimir Putin is leaving nothing to chance in this election. This is a referendum on Mr Putin's leadership, but the outcome has already been decided. Even though Putin still enjoys considerable support among much of the Russian public, the state is determined to control these elections closely to remove any chance of error. Per official results, Putin won the previous presidential election in 2018 with 77.53 per cent of the popular vote with 67.50 per cent voter turnout. This being a wartime election, he will intend to exceed that.

 

“Russia’s onerous requirements for candidate nomination and registration saw two candidates with anti-war platforms, Yekaterina Duntsova and Boris Nadezhdin, barred from running, although neither was likely to achieve mass support. Only three other candidates - all weak candidates from Russia’s ‘systemic opposition’ - have been cleared to run: Nikolai Kharitonov of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF), Leonid Slutsky of the wildly misnamed Liberal Democratic Party (LDPR) a right-wing nationalist party, and Vladislav Davankov of New People, a recently created Kremlin-controlled, nominally liberal party. They are not running to win - their presence on the ballot is there to remind voters of the lack of credible alternatives to Putin and Putin’s indispensability to the system.

“None of this means that these elections are meaningless. They are a huge exercise in democratic ritual with nearly 115 million eligible voters, and according to Russian state media involve more than one million organisers. They are an opportunity for the Putin regime to gather information about the electorate, test the regime’s capacity to mobilise voters and, by delivering a predetermined victory for Putin, demonstrate the supposed near-universal support for Putin. The results will be neither free nor fair, but the regime will try to maintain the appearance of a clean election and not resort to blatant electoral fraud. 

 

"While Putin still enjoys a considerable degree of support among the Russian electorate, the lengths his regime has gone to to manage these Presidential elections and exclude all serious competition should be read as a sign of its decadence and vulnerability, not strength.”

  

For any other topics on which you may be seeking expert comment, please contact the Monash University Media team on +61 3 9903 4840 or media@monash.edu

More from this category

  • Political
  • 18/10/2024
  • 13:24
Family First

Family First to Fight for Repeal of Dangerous ‘Equality’ Bill

Family First has pledged to repeal the dangerous Equality Legislation Amendment (LGBTIQA+) Bill if its candidates are elected to the NSW Parliament in 2027. The bill put forward by Alex Greenwich, which passed the lower house of the NSW Parliament today, threatens the safety and rights of women, girls, and children by removing key safeguards in the name of so-called equality. Lyle Shelton, National Director of Family First, expressed deep concern about the implications of the bill, particularly its allowance biological men to identify as women by changing their sex on their birth certificates at a whim. “This exposes girls…

  • Political
  • 17/10/2024
  • 12:21
Family First Party

Family First Party will Draft New Law to Protect Faith-Based Organisations from Hostile Government Takeovers

The Family First Party has announced that if elected to the cross bench it will immediately pursue new legislation designed to prevent hostile public takeovers of faith-based organisations, following recent national concerns over such actions – particularly the Labor Green Government takeover of Calvary Hospital. The draft law will aim to protect the autonomy and values of religious institutions that serve communities through education, healthcare, and charity. The acquisition of Calvary raised alarm among religious and civil society groups, who fear that similar actions could undermine the missions of faith-based organisations, forcing them to compromise on their core beliefs and…

  • Government Federal, Political
  • 17/10/2024
  • 06:59
Centre For Future Work

New polling shows supermarkets are public enemy No. 1 in the cost-of-living crisis

New polling shows supermarkets are Australians' public enemy No. 1 in the cost-of-living crisis. The Australia Institute’s Carmichael Centre/Centre for Future Work surveyed 1014 voters about increasing costs. Some 83% said supermarkets deserve some blame, or a great deal of blame, for the soaring cost of living. That puts them ahead of energy companies (82%), banks (73%) and government (71%). Three in five (60%) respondents nominated groceries as the most noticed cost increase, far ahead of the next highest result of utilities at 21%. There is a strong appetite among voters to increase supermarket competition, with almost two-thirds (64%) saying…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.