Skip to content
Emergency Services, Environment

Expert group calls for overhaul of disaster review

Independent Bushfire Group 2 mins read

After examining the recommendations from the NSW Coronial Inquiry into the 2019/2020 Bushfires, released on 27 March, the Independent Bushfire Group (IBG) is even more disappointed with the outcome.

 

“Four years is too long to wait for this. And most of the recommendations are about correcting basic procedures. While the emphasis on safety and training is welcome, it is concerning that the coroner found it necessary to spend a lot of the inquiry’s time on fundamentals that could have been fixed years ago,” acting convenor of IBG Gregor Manson said.

 

“The inquiry only examined six specific issues, so how many flawed procedures might continue in areas that still haven’t been independently looked at? The coroner finding so many simple but important problems - more than four years later - proves the need for more timely, continuous and expert disaster reviews.

 

“The recommendations in total will do little to keep fires as small as possible in future disasters. For example, there are no recommended improvements for initial attack, suppression strategies or aircraft mix and effectiveness.

 

“Volunteer firefighters and damaged communities deserve nothing less than a complete overhaul of how disasters are reviewed. Neither the NSW Bushfire Inquiry nor the coronial inquiry could do more than scratch the surface of firefighting operations. We need a standing expert body to dig deeper for the fires, storms and floods that are getting worse with climate change.

 

“Contrary to what some say, an Inspector General of Emergency Management (IGEM) would not be an additional burden and it would have no role in day-to-day operations. The 2020 Royal Commission into National Natural Disaster Arrangements recommended just such an assurance and accountability body for all states.

 

“The public needs to have confidence that vital disaster services are being constantly assessed and improved. A well-constructed expert review body should be welcomed by response agencies because it would help deliver better outcomes for their volunteers and communities.

 

“An IGEM would remove the need for ad hoc inquiries like the one into NSW bushfires. It would feed expert advice into coronials, just as the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) did with the 2020 large air tanker crash. Bushfire and flood inquiries demand massive amounts of time and money from agencies that could have been better spent with better results. 

 

“A IGEM would oversee emergency lessons management and undertake specific reviews as necessary. It would avoid much of the glare of publicity, obstructive legalism and defensiveness of the ineffective processes of the past.

 

“We can’t understand why the NSW government is dodging this very sensible way forward. Surely a body that in some ways mirrors the approach of the highly regarded ATSB can and should be applied to major bushfires and floods. Both disasters have repeatedly hit communities hard, yet the government does nothing to improve the way disasters are analysed. It’s time to fix this,” Mr Manson concluded.

 

 


About us:

The Independent Bushfire Group is a group of non-aligned bushfire practitioners, fire managers, land managers, researchers and ecologists with over 450 years of collective experience across a range of fire landscapes. The IBG advocates for better fire management so we can adapt to our worsening fire climate, with a focus on practical firefighting, science and evidence-based practices.


Contact details:

IBG Acting Convenor Gregor Manson, 0408 484 250, gregor.manson@bigpond.com

IBG Secretary Ian Brown, 0428 837 106, ianb@windycliff.com.au

More from this category

  • Environment
  • 26/07/2024
  • 10:20
NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA)

NSW EPA Investigating Allegations of Falsified Sample Results

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is investigating environmental consultant Noel Child of N G Child & Associates, in relation to allegations of falsified sampling results in a number of environmental reports across NSW. The EPA understands that part of Mr Child’s role was to test potential development sites and then make environmental assessments for clients as part of development applications to local councils. We seized more than 10,000 pieces of data and have finished reviewing 2,460 files and are investigating alleged falsified samples. Following a review of all available data, the EPA confirms that there are no immediate risks…

  • Contains:
  • Environment, Government Federal
  • 26/07/2024
  • 07:59
Australian Conservation Foundation, Australian Marine Conservation Society, BirdLife Australia,

MEDIA ALERT: National environment groups call for stronger Nature Positive bills

Ahead of their appearance before the Senate inquiry into stage 2 of the Nature Positive bills, leaders of national environment groups will join together…

  • Contains:
  • Environment
  • 26/07/2024
  • 04:26
Bureau Veritas

Bureau Veritas: Early Impact of the New LEAP | 28 Strategy Boosting Revenue and Improving Margins1 in the First Half; 2024 Revenue Outlook Upgraded

H1 2024 Key figures2 › Revenue of EUR 3,021.7 million in the first half of 2024, up 4.0% year on year and up 9.2%…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.