Skip to content
Environment

NAMBUCCA WATERWAYS NOT IMPACTED BY EXCESSIVE PESTICIDES

NSW EPA 2 mins read
water testing

 

A pesticides compliance campaign by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) and Nambucca Valley Council has found that water quality is not being impacted by excessive amounts of pesticides.

As part of the EPA pesticide compliance campaign, EPA and Nambucca Valley officers last month inspected a range of local farms and undertook water quality monitoring at nine local waterways including Eungai Creek, Snakey Creek, Taylors Arm, Blackbutt Creek, Nambucca River, South Creek, Newee Creek, Deep Creek and Oyster Creek.

Water samples were tested for almost 100 pesticides, including commonly used herbicides, fungicides and insecticides. Three pesticides were detected at low levels but below the National Water Quality Guideline limits.

NSW EPA Director of Operations, Steve Orr said the results show impacts to waterways in the Nambucca Valley region are low but noted that further improvements at some local farms are needed.

“We are pleased with these results but it is essential that some local growers, including producers of bananas, cucumbers and blueberries, improve their practices to comply with NSW’s pesticide laws and better protect the environment,” Mr Orr said.

“Our officers inspected seven farms, three were found to be compliant, but one operator was issued a Clean Up Notice for pesticide storage and waste issues. We are continuing to investigate a further three farms.

“We understand the importance of these local farms to NSW produce and the local region’s economy but want to ensure that use of pesticides is appropriate so we can protect both the community and the local environment.”

“We will continue to work closely with farmers, council and the community to ensure that pesticides are used responsibly.”

Changes that commenced on 3 April 2024 have significantly increased maximum penalties for many serious offences in the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Pesticides Act 1999.

 Wilful or negligent use of pesticides that harms any non-target animal or plant can now attract penalties of up to $500,000 for an individual and $2,000,000 for a corporation.

Possessing or using an unregistered pesticide or using a pesticide contrary to the approved label can also trigger fines of up to a $60,000 for an individual and $120,000 for a corporation.

If you suspect pesticide misuse is occurring, you can make a report to the NSW Environment Line on 131 555.

Find out how to make a report or find more information about the EPA’s recent compliance campaign EPA website: https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/pesticides/preventing-pesticide-misuse


Contact details:

media@epa.nsw.gov.au

Media

More from this category

  • Entertainment, Environment
  • 20/05/2024
  • 10:17
Comms Declare

Consumer watchdog asked to investigate MasterChef ‘renewable gas’ claims

Claims that ‘renewable gas’ is making MasterChef ‘greener’ are under scrutiny following a complaint to the ACCC. Climate communications group, Comms Declare, has asked the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to investigate claims by the Australian Gas Network (AGN) as part of its sponsorship of Australia’s most loved cooking show. Specific claims in the complaint includeMasterChef host Andy Allenin Episode 4 saying“And I’m excited to say this year, MasterChef is going greener with renewable gas”. Founder of Comms Declare, Belinda Noble said, “We believe that hundreds of thousands of MasterChef fans are being deceived into thinking that the gas…

  • Contains:
  • Environment
  • 20/05/2024
  • 07:00
NSW Environment Protection Authority

Stricter controls to address climate change in planning decisions

Climate change will be at the forefront of the NSW planning process to help meet the state’s net zero targets, under new requirements and guidance released today for public feedback. For the first time, proponents of large-emitting projects must provide robust and consistent information about their potential greenhouse gas emissions, to align with net zero targets and legislation to better inform planning decisions. This includes developments heavily reliant on fossil fuels and non-renewable electricity, or that have the potential to release large quantities of methane gas, such as coal mines, landfills, chemical manufacturers, cement and metal producers, and waste management…

  • Contains:
  • Environment, Political
  • 17/05/2024
  • 12:10
Solutions for Climate Australia

Opposition Budget in Reply: Peter Dutton has no plan on climate change

National advocacy group Solutions for Climate Australia called out Opposition Leader Peter Dutton for not making a single mention of climate change in his Budget in Reply. “Climate change poses a great threat to Australia’s way of life,” said Dr Barry Traill, Director of Solutions for Climate Australia. “The economic impact of increased fires, floods and droughts is ignored in the Budget in Reply. The increased costs to households from the impact on food production and skyrocketing cost of insurance are also ignored.“The Coalition has no plan to cut emissions this decade and no plan to protect Australians from intensifying…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.