Skip to content
Energy, Government WA

WA environment groups welcome change to Appeals Committee for the North West Shelf Project Extension

Conservation Council of WA 2 mins read

WA environment groups have responded to the reported removal of former Chevron employee, Simon McKirdy, from the Appeals Committee for Australia’s biggest climate decision, the North West Shelf Project Extension, the largest part of Woodside’s Burrup Hub mega-project, due to a perceived conflict of interest.

Mr McKirdy was appointed to the two-person committee last month by WA’s Environment Minister, Reece Whitby, having reportedly previously worked for Chevron from 2013 to 2016. McKirdy reportedly currently works for Murdoch University’s Harry Butler Institute, which was co-founded by Chevron.

WA Environment Minister Reece Whitby announced this morning that he had revoked Professor McKirdy’s appointment to the Appeals Committee following legal advice from the WA State Solicitor’s Office.

Chevron is an equal one-sixth foundation participant in the North West Shelf Project, and stands to benefit directly from the proposed extension.

The Appeals Committee is to prepare a final report and recommendations to the Environment Minister on the record 776 appeals against the North West Shelf Project extension.

Ed Schuller, former Executive Director of Regulatory Services within the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) was recently appointed as the acting Appeals Convenor, but recused himself from this specific investigation due to his previous role at DWER. This gave rise to the need for a special, Minister-appointed, appeals committee.

Jess Beckerling, the Executive Director of the Conservation Council of WA, said:

“The North West Shelf project is seeking to extend Woodside’s Burrup Hub until 2070, which would make it the biggest new fossil fuel project in the southern hemisphere. The disastrous potential of this proposal has already drawn a record setting 776 appeals against it by the WA public.

“The North West Shelf Project extension is Australia’s biggest climate decision and will emit nearly nine-times Australia’s annual carbon emissions. The project’s devastating climate and cultural impacts have garnered massive public interest and the people of WA are rightly concerned about the integrity of this process. There is huge public interest in this appeal and good process is vital given the long term consequences of any decision.

“With all due respect to Professor McKirdy, we are pleased the Minister is taking steps to avoid real or perceived conflict of interest. It is critical that the massive carbon emissions as well as the cultural and environmental impacts are fully considered. This means that the North West Shelf project must be rejected.”

Martin Pritchard, Campaigns Director of Environs Kimberley, said:

“We have seen with Woodside’s James Price Point proposal how the mishandling of conflicts of interest on the EPA’s Board can derail a project entirely and make the approval unlawful and invalid through a court case.

“It’s critical that a decision that would have globally significant carbon pollution as well as potentially drive demand for fracking in our pristine Kimberley region, is free from any perception of bias.”

ENDS

CONTACT: To arrange further interviews or comment, or for any enquiries relating to this media release, please contact 0412 272 570 or by email on media@ccwa.org.au

MEDIA INFORMATION: The Conservation Council of WA (CCWA) is the state’s foremost non-profit, non-government conservation organisation representing nearly 100 environmental organisations across Western Australia. 

For more information, visit: ccwa.org.au.

More from this category

  • Business Company News, Energy
  • 21/06/2024
  • 12:35
CIMIC Group

CIMIC’s UGL awarded $125m electrical maintenance contract by Western Power

CIMIC Group company UGL will deliver a major program of maintenance and upgrade works for Western Power, a Western Australian State Government owned corporation…

  • Contains:
  • Energy, Environment
  • 19/06/2024
  • 15:31
350.org Pacific

350.org Pacific responds to Australian Coalition nuclear plans

Canberra, Australia -Today Australia’s opposition leader, Peter Dutton announced a Coalition government’s future nuclear energy plans. Dutton named seven proposed sites for nuclear plants after boldly claiming the plan would cost less than Australia’s renewable energy development. Nuclear power plants are currently banned in all states and territories in Australia. While the final cost has not been revealed, it is estimated that a nuclear power plant in Australia would cost at least $8.5 billion. Jacynta Fa’amau,350.org Pacific Campaigner says: “This nuclear fantasy is a distraction from genuine climate action on Australia’s part. The Coalition claims to have the concerns of…

  • Energy, Political
  • 19/06/2024
  • 13:57
Mining and Energy Union

Nuclear plans no help for Latrobe Valley coal workers: MEU

Nuclear power stations will not provide a pathway into new employment for coal-fired power industry workers and the current debate is a distraction from securing new jobs in the Latrobe Valley, the Mining and Energy Union said today. With Peter Dutton’s Coalition announcing Loy Yang in Victoria as a future site for a nuclear power station, the MEU said workers and communities needed viable new industries sooner than could be provided by nuclear. Victorian District President, Andy Smith said that workers in the Latrobe Valley were at a critical point, facing closures in the next few years. “Yallourn Power Station…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.