Skip to content
Energy, Political

Nuclear plans no help for coal power workers: MEU

Mining and Energy Union 2 mins read

Nuclear power stations will not provide a pathway into new employment for workers in the coal-fired power industry and the current debate is a distraction from securing new jobs in regions affected by energy transition, the Mining and Energy Union said today.

With Peter Dutton’s Coalition announcing seven coal power stations as sites for nuclear power stations, the MEU said workers and communities needed viable new industries sooner than could be provided by nuclear. 

“We are at a critical moment where workers are facing closures in the next few years. 

“Even if nuclear energy was a popular option, according to the CSIRO, the earliest a large-scale nuclear plant could commence operations is no sooner than 2040. 

“The clock is ticking; we need to be focusing our efforts on delivering an orderly transition for the thousands of workers and their communities who are staring down the barrel of the energy transition now.”

  • Eraring Power Station in Lake Macquarie is set to close in 2027.
  • Callide B Power Station in Central Queensland and Yallourn Power Station in the Latrobe Valley are set to close in 2028. 
  • Bayswater Power Station in the Hunter Valley and Vales Point Power Station in Lake Macquarie are set to close in 2033.
  • Loy Yang A Power Station in Victoria is set to close in 2035.
  • Collie Power Station in Western Australia is set to close in 2027.
  • Muja Power Station in Western Australia is set to close in 2029. 

“Power stations in the proposed sites for nuclear would be long closed before the plants would become operational, and if no support is provided, those workers and communities will have already packed up their lives and moved on. 

“Now is not the time for distractions. We need to be acting to deliver an orderly transition that focuses on jobs, economic activity in affected regions and positive social outcomes for affected workers while we still have the chance.

“We are also disappointed the Coalition has announced this policy with no consultation with these coal power regions about whether they want a nuclear future.” 

More from this category

  • Energy
  • 16/07/2024
  • 18:56
Ras al-Khair Special Economic Zone

Ras Al-Khair Special Economic Zone Lures Investment with International Partnerships in Maritime Industry and Offshore Cluster

The new special economic zone offers the MENA region’s largest shipyard and a significant maritime hub, backed by the Saudi government and major industry…

  • Contains:
  • Agriculture Farming Rural, Political
  • 16/07/2024
  • 12:30
Farmers for Climate Action

Farmers welcome carbon capture ban recommendations

Farmers welcome carbon capture ban recommendations Tuesday, 16 July, 2024 Senate Environment and Communications References Committee recommends ban on carbon capture storage across the Great Artesian Basin Basin provides water for farmers across huge areas of our continent The Senate Committee recommended updating “water trigger” legislation so the effects of all CCS projects on vital groundwater are assessed Farmers for Climate Action has welcomed strong recommendations from the Senate Environment and Communications References Committee on carbon capture and storage, following US coal giant Glencore’s attempt to store coal waste underground in the Great Artesian Basin. The Great Artesian Basin or…

  • Energy
  • 16/07/2024
  • 01:11
Zayed Sustainability Prize

Zayed Sustainability Prize Demonstrates Global Reach and Impact with over 5,900 Submissions

US $5.9 million Prize attracts submissions from 156 countries High number of entries leverage advanced technologies like artificial intelligence and blockchain to address pressing…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.