Skip to content
Legal, LGBTQIA

Monash Expert: Federal Court victory for transgender women in Tickle vs Giggle case

Monash University 3 mins read

The Federal Court of Australia has today handed down its landmark judgement on a case brought by a transgender woman, Roxanne Giggle, against social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app. 

 

In the case before the Federal Court, Ms Tickle alleged unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity. It is the first time the gender identity discrimination provisions have been tested since they were added to the Sex Discrimination Act in 2013. A Monash human rights law expert is available to discuss the case and its legal ramifications for future trans discrimination cases in Australia.

 

Professor Paula Gerber, Monash Faculty of Law

Contact: +61 410 596 494 or paula.gerber@monash.edu

Read more of Professor Gerber’s commentary at Monash Lens 

The following can be attributed to Professor Gerber: 

 

“This decision is a great win for transgender women in Australia. The Court explicitly found that the Giggle for Girls App indirectly discriminated against Roxanne Tickle on the basis of her gender identity, in breach of the Sex Discrimination Act. She was excluded after Sally Grover, the Chief Executive, looked at the photo Roxanne Tickle had uploaded with her application, and reached the visual conclusion that she was a man.

 

“She was indirectly discriminated against because Sally Grover did not think Ms Tickle looked sufficiently female. The Court found that ‘The imposed condition of needing to appear to be a cisgendered female in photos submitted to the Giggle App had the effect of disadvantaging transgender women who did not meet that condition, and in particular Ms Tickle.’ 

 

“This case sends a clear message to all Australians that it is unlawful to treat transgender women differently from cisgender women. It is not lawful to make decisions about whether a person is a woman based on how feminine they appear.

 

“The Court found that there had been indirect discrimination, not direct discrimination, because there was insufficient evidence to prove that Sally Grover knew that Roxanne Tickle was transgender. Ms Grover excluded her from the App because she thought Ms Tickle was a man, not because she thought she was a transgender woman. The Judge held that, ‘I am left to conclude that it is most likely she did not know that Ms Tickle was a transgender woman when she reviewed her selfie, and instead excluded her on the quick or reflexive decision that she appeared to Ms Grover to be a male. Of course, given Ms Grover’s views, her decision almost certainly would have been the same had she been aware of Ms Tickle’s gender identity.’

 

“The Federal Court also rejected Giggle’s argument that the Sex Discrimination Act is unconstitutional because the Federal Government did not have the power to enact such laws. Justice Bromwich found that the Foreign Affairs power in the Australian Constitution authorises the government to enact laws giving effect to its international treaty obligations. The Sex Discrimination Act gave effect to Australia’s obligations under Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which provides that ‘All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.’ The judge held that the words ‘other status’ include discrimination on the basis of gender identity. Thus, the Sex Discrimination Act, including the 2013 amendments to it regarding gender identity discrimination were constitutional.

 

“Excluding Roxanne Tickle from the Giggle for Girls App was an expensive exercise for the Respondent who was ordered to pay compensation of $10,000 to Roxanne Tickle as well as Ms Tickle’s costs capped at $50,000.”

 

For more Monash media stories visit our news & events site: monash.edu/news

For any other topics on which you may be seeking expert comment, contact the Monash University Media Unit on +61 3 9903 4840 or media@monash.edu

More from this category

  • Legal
  • 11/02/2025
  • 07:39
Slater and Gordon

No Driver, No Problem? What happens if you’re hit by a self-driving car

As self-driving and semi-autonomous vehicles gain popularity across Australia and the globe the question of what happens if you’re in a collision with a car nobody was technically driving must now be considered. Experts in motor vehicle accidents say it’s crucial for motorists to understand their legal rights and responsibilities in the event of an accident involving such technology. Head of Work and Road Claims at Slater and Gordon Bree Smith said that the legal landscape is evolving, and awareness is key to ensuring all parties are adequately protected. “As of now, fully autonomous vehicles are not yet legal for…

  • Contains:
  • General News, LGBTQIA
  • 10/02/2025
  • 09:02
UNSW Sydney

Results of largest-ever survey of LGBTIQA+SB people shows many have experienced sexual violence: report

New research from UNSW Sydney addresses the glaring gap in national and global research by focusing on the experiences of sexual violence among LGBTIQA+SB Australians. The findings from the world’s largest survey ofLGBTIQA+SB experiences of sexual violence show more funding, support and research is needed to prevent and respond to the increased risk of victimisation and abuse faced by these communities. The National Survey of LGBTIQA+SB Experiences of Sexual Violence was undertaken by UNSW researchers from the Gendered Violence Research Network and funded by the Federal Department of Social Services.Though the survey is not designed to be representative, the nearly…

  • Legal, Medical Health Aged Care
  • 10/02/2025
  • 07:50
Slater and Gordon

Asbestos warning for residents affected by Queensland floods

As the clean-up continues across Queensland after widespread flooding, residents are being urged to be cautious of asbestos. Hannah Murray, Associate in Dust Diseases and Asbestos at Slater and Gordon Lawyers, warns that the inhalation of asbestos dust and fibres can cause mesothelioma, an aggressive terminal cancer for which there is no cure. “There’s a real concern that residents may start the clean-up process without taking precautions. "The material will already be disturbed from the flood damaged, and that increases the chance and danger of breathing in the deadly fibres,” Ms Murray said. In Australia a staggering 1 in 3…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.