Skip to content
Energy, Government QLD

The LNP’s coal commitment could cost Queenslanders $420 million per year

Queensland Conservation Council 2 mins read

17 October 2024

Keeping Callide B open beyond its 2028 end of life could cost Queenslanders up to $420 million a year, and expose us to risks of wholesale power price spikes by stifling investment in renewable energy backed by storage. 

 

CS Energy’s annual reports show that Callide B appears to have recorded a real loss of $120 million over the last five years, an average of $60 million per year. As a Government owned entity, this is money that the taxpayers ultimately have paid.

 

The Queensland Conservation Council has condemned the LNP’s comments on extending the life of Queensland’s coal fired power stations, starting with Callide B, as expensive, financially irresponsible and counter-productive. 

Queensland Conservation Council Energy Strategist Clare Silcock said:

“The LNP’s comments about keeping Callide B open beyond the end of its life are playing dangerous politics with our energy system. Callide B was designed with a life span of 40 years.

“Keeping it open beyond then could cost Queenslanders up to $420 million in 2029 and expose us to higher risks of outages and pollution.

“Coal fired power stations are increasingly a liability as they age and more renewable energy comes online. The troubled Callide C is a stark example of this, where we’ve seen multiple catastrophic failures, and the private company that owns half of the power plant has gone into administration because they can’t front the costs of keeping coal fired power stations open.

 

“Neighbouring Callide B is also experiencing reliability issues. Over the past three years it’s only been able to operate at 70% capacity due to numerous unit breakdowns, often during summer at times of peak demand.

 

“We can replace Callide B by 2028, and invest this money in renewable energy backed by storage which will set us up for decades of affordable, reliable electricity, not keep us hostage to failing coal fired power stations.”

 

Media contact: Ellie McLachlan, 0407 753 830

Available for comment: Clare Silcock, 0481 055 531

 

ENDS


Contact details:

Ellie McLachlan, 0407 753 830

 

More from this category

  • Energy, Industrial Relations
  • 19/03/2025
  • 13:08
Mining and Energy Union

Yallourn workers need certainty, not political games

The Mining and Energy Union Victorian District is urging the Victorian State Government and Energy Australia to come together in productive and transparent discussions over the future of Yallourn Power Station and its workforce. Workers at Yallourn are distressed by the contradictory statements in the media regarding the future of the Station and are demanding certainty regarding the future of their jobs and community from the State Government and Energy Australia. Andy Smith, President of the MEU Victorian District which represents power station workers at Yallourn and throughout the Latrobe Valley, is calling for any future discussions to be transparent,…

  • Energy
  • 19/03/2025
  • 10:02
Queensland Conservation Council

New Report: Nuclear could suck Brisbane dry and still meltdown

Wednesday 19 March 2025 The Coalition’s proposed nuclear sites in Queensland would not have access to enough water to manage a nuclear incident, according to an explosive new report by the Queensland Conservation Council. We’ve just hit 14 years since the Fukushima nuclear accident. The new report shows that during the Fukushima emergency, the nuclear facility was flooded with 1.3 million cubic metres of sea water to prevent the plant from blowing up – more than a 1,000 times the water available in the dams connected to the existing coal generators the Coalition wants to turn nuclear. According to the…

  • Contains:
  • Energy, Federal Election
  • 19/03/2025
  • 08:37
Australian Conservation Foundation

Water-guzzling, waste-making nuclear not right for Australia

New analysis reveals the staggering volumes of water required to keep nuclear reactors cool. The analysis, issued today by the Australian Conservation Foundation shows an average-sized 1GW nuclear reactor consumes around 50 million litres of water a day – that’s 20 Olympic swimming pools of water every day. It’s also 25% more water than an equivalent coal-fired power station consumes in a day. “To pour this much scarce freshwater into a nuclear reactor every day would place another strain on Australia’s already stretched water resources, harming rivers and wildlife and further diminishing the water available for farmers,” said ACF’s nuclear…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.