Skip to content
Agriculture Farming Rural, Energy

The quiet majority: Australians in Renewable Energy Zones support the energy shift

Farmers for Climate Action and 89 Degrees East 2 mins read
  • 89 Degrees East polled 1001 people across energy shift regions
  • 70% support clean energy projects on farmland in their community, 17% oppose
  • Most don’t realise they’re part of the quiet majority who support clean energy

 

Some 70% of rural Australians living in renewable energy zones support the energy shift, with only 17% opposed. However, many do not realise they are part of the quiet majority.

 

These are the findings of polling of Renewable Energy Zones (REZ), and farmer focus group work, carried out by 89 Degrees East and commissioned by Farmers for Climate Action, representing its 8400 farmer members.

 

Some 1001 people living in renewable energy zones were polled in September/October. The results were:

  • 70% support clean energy projects on farmland in their local community, 12% don’t know, 17% oppose
  • 73% of those with a connection to farming support clean energy projects on local farmland
  • 71% of those polled said farmers who choose to should be allowed to host clean energy on their farms
  • Key benefits listed were “bonus” income for farmers; more reliable energy for the local community, and general benefits eg investment in the local economy
  • Key concerns listed were any disruption of farming activities; impact on nature
  • Some 75% say clean energy operators should pay an energy bill bonus to local households and businesses
  • 69% say local communities can benefit from renewables done right
  • Only 30% of REZ residents recognise farmers already make very good money from clean energy rent
  • Support comes with conditions: community benefit, consultation, access to reliable energy, looking after nature

 

 

 

The key findings from the farmer focus groups, which featured farmers aged between 26 and 67 from every state across Australia, were:

 

  • Clean energy rent is seen as a good way to diversify farm income
  • Farmers hope renewables can deliver more reliable energy to them and their communities
  • The majority of farmers support “renewables done right” on farmland
  • Farmers do not trust developers and called for strong regulation from government on decommissioning

 

Farmers for Climate Action CEO Natalie Collard said the results showing more than two thirds support and 17% opposition to local clean energy, matched that of a recent Porter Novelli regional poll, the CSIRO survey of 6000+ people, Renewable Energy Zone polling by RE-Alliance, and even the results across the recent NSW council elections.

 

“The data shows the quiet majority of rural Australia is clearly in favour of clean energy projects locally, although many don’t realise they’re part of the quiet majority,” Ms Collard said.

 

“Those who don’t support clean energy and those who do have a lot in common - they express the same valid concerns.

 

“Regional Australia is clearly asking the Government to hold developers to account as they aim to build clean energy projects. Those polled clearly ask for the Government to take charge on decommissioning, even though the vast majority of clean energy contracts already require the operator to decommission the project, and this means decommissioning would be covered by insurance should a company go broke.

 

“Just 30% of Renewable Energy Zone residents realised farmers do well from renewable energy. With farmers being offered more than $40,000 per turbine per year and $1500 per hectare per year for solar, while they continue to farm cattle around the turbines and sheep under the solar, it’s very good, drought proof money.”

 

ENDS

 

Media contact: Les White 0409805122 les@lockslie.com

Media

More from this category

  • Agriculture Farming Rural, Environment
  • 07/12/2024
  • 11:48
Friends of the Earth Australia

Are Biosolids and Compost a Source of PFAS Pollution in the Belabula River?

In early 2024, farmers living in proximity to the Belabula River in New South Wales (part of the Lachlan River catchment inWiradyuricountry), reported foam containing PFAS along a stretch of the river. Local residents collected samples of the foam and subsequent analysis found that the foam was detected at 1800 times the safe drinking water limit and 4000 times the 99% ecological trigger level. The pollution was reported by the ABC in August 2024 with the NSW EPA starting an investigation a few months earlier. The pollution is a major environmental headache. Could the same scenario occur in other rivers…

  • Agriculture Farming Rural
  • 06/12/2024
  • 23:10
Newmont

Newmont Announces Agreement to Divest CC&V for up to $275 Million

Divestitures Announced to Date to Generate up to $3.9 Billion in Gross Proceeds DENVER–BUSINESS WIRE– Newmont Corporation (NYSE: NEM, TSX: NGT, ASX: NEM, PNGX:…

  • Contains:
  • Energy, Political
  • 06/12/2024
  • 08:30
Climate Media Centre

Talent alert: Hunter locals speak out on nuclear risks as political inquiry comes to town

Friday, December 6 A political hearing in Muswellbrook next week will hear from Hunter Valley locals on their opposition to building nuclear reactors in the region. The federal Parliament’s select committee on nuclear energy is looking into a scheme from the Coalition to build nuclear reactors at sites around the country, including in the Hunter. Local doctors, former coal workers, workers’ advocates and others advocating for the Hunter’s renewable power future are speaking out against the scheme. They say the community wants investment in safe and reliable renewable power, not risky nuclear reactors in the region. They are concerned about…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.