Skip to content
Insurance

Insurer sanctioned by CGC for serious claims and complaints handling failures

General Insurance Code Governance Committee 2 mins read

The General Insurance Code Governance Committee (CGC) has sanctioned an insurer for significant breaches of the industry Code of Practice, requiring it to make a $100,000 Community Benefit Payment.

Serious failures in the insurer’s handling of claims and complaints significantly impacted 35 customers, including 22 affected by severe weather events.

Chair of the CGC Ms Veronique Ingram explained that the insurer did not meet expectations.

“When customers turn to insurers for help during times of crisis, they have the right to expect timely, effective, and fair support. This insurer fell well short of that expectation,” she said.

Operational changes introduced by the insurer led to confusion and a breakdown in processes and accountability, resulting in delays and ineffective repairs that prolonged hardship for many customers.

“The harm caused by these failures underscores the critical need for robust claims management practices,” Ms Ingram said.

The insurer also failed to address customer complaints, compounding the harm caused.

One customer had to make 12 complaints before their issues were addressed, revealing significant deficiencies in how the insurer handled complaints.

The insurer has since paid $1.2 million in compensation to affected customers, in addition to completing repairs and settling claims. The insurer has also conducted a comprehensive review to address the systemic issues in its claims handling processes.

“We acknowledge the insurer’s commitment to fixing its mistakes and compensating impacted customers,” Ms Ingram said. “The proactive response is a reminder to all insurers that swift and transparent action can restore trust after things go wrong.”

As part of the sanction, the insurer will make a $100,000 Community Benefit Payment which will be distributed to a charity.

“This Community Benefit Payment reflects the severity of the harm caused while ensuring a positive outcome for others who may find themselves in vulnerable situations,” Ms Ingram said.

The CGC’s decision not to name the insurer in the sanction reflects the insurer’s proactive and effective response to the breaches, and its cooperation, transparency, and accountability in addressing the harm it caused.

“The insurer’s actions immediately after identifying its failures set a strong example for the industry,” Ms Ingram said. “Taking responsibility, comprehensively rectifying harm, and learning from mistakes are the standards we expect all insurers to uphold.”

The CGC continues to monitor industry compliance and expects insurers to act swiftly, take accountability, and implement robust processes to protect customers and uphold trust in the insurance industry.

Read the full summary of the sanction.


About us:

The General Insurance Code Governance Committee is an independent body that monitors and enforces insurers’ compliance with the Code of Practice.


Contact details:

[email protected]

More from this category

  • Insurance
  • 10/07/2025
  • 09:25
Descartes

Australian-inspired flood insurance product deployed in the US

Australian-inspired flood insurance product deployed in the US Descartes has announced the launch of its Flood-at-Location policy in the United States, following its proven success in Australia. The solution was originally developed in response to catastrophic flood events that have impacted Queensland and NSW and offers a cost-effective solution for flood risk. Using precise, no-contact sensors installed on-site to measure flood depth in real time, Flood-at-Location enables fast, transparent payouts, which helps clients recover quickly and stay resilient. Like Australia, the US has been affected by significant flooding – just last year, heavy rainfall from Hurricane Helene led to the…

  • Contains:
  • Insurance, Legal
  • 01/07/2025
  • 15:27
Attwood Marshall Lawyers

Bupa incorrectly rejecting claims is just another example of unethical and illegal conduct by insurers

Contact Shan Harvey, Media Specialist on 0438 772 752 or [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION 1 July 2025 Bupa incorrectly rejecting claims is just another example of unethical andillegal conduct by insurers For those of us who remember the 1997 Francis Ford Coppola movie based on John Grisham’s book, The Rainmaker, the film brought to Hollywood the story of insurance companies refusing clients in need. This theme appeared in Grisham's other works too reflecting real-world concerns about insurance practices. What we have witnessed here in Australia would not be out of place in one of Grisham’s books - namely the appalling…

  • Finance Investment, Insurance
  • 01/07/2025
  • 09:42
Choosi

THE “SAY-DO” GAP: AUSSIES CONFESS TO FINANCIAL RED FLAGS DESPITE KNOWING BETTER

Choosi’s Financial Red Flags Survey reveals a disconnect between what Australians believe is financially responsible and their actual behaviour SYDNEY, June 2025 – As Aussies continue to face financial pressures and adjust to cost increases, a gap between what Aussies know is the 'right' financial choice, and what they actually do, is widening. New research looking at the spending, saving, investing and planning habits of Australians has found that while Gen Z and Millennials (Gen Y) are more likely to recognise risky financial behaviors as ‘red flags’, they're also significantly more likely to engage in them.Some of these 'red flag’…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.