Skip to content
Energy, Government Federal

Before we decide where to dump nuclear waste, let’s answer the bigger questions

Australians for Affordable Energy 2 mins read

Australians for Affordable Energy is urging caution following calls for South Australia to become a nuclear power hub and waste storage site, warning fundamental questions about nuclear remain unanswered.

Alexander Downer’s comments advocating for nuclear power plants in South Australia and positioning the state as a nuclear waste storage site are deeply concerning given there has been no comprehensive discussion around nuclear power.

The nuclear debate must go beyond location discussion and first address economic and logistic concerns, Australians for Affordable Energy spokesperson Jo Dodds said. 

"Before we even talk about where to dump nuclear waste, we need to ask some hard questions. How much will nuclear really cost Australian taxpayers? What will it do to energy prices and the cost of living? How long will it take to build? Who funds insurance?” Ms Dodd said.

“There are global examples of nuclear projects that have blown out in cost and time frames and just fallen over, leaving consumers to foot the bill. Australians deserve transparency on these issues before any commitments are made.”

The practical implications of nuclear power for everyday Australians remain unclear. Australians deserve a full and open discussion of nuclear power's real impacts rather than ideological endorsements from political figures.

“We know nuclear energy requires massive upfront investment, long construction times, intensive oversight, expensive insurance, and creates long-term waste management challenges. These factors could seriously impact affordability -for the country and individuals who will have to pay the bills since private investment won't go near nuclear,” Ms Dodds said.

“We need an evidence-based national conversation about our energy future before committing to specific locations for waste storage. We can’t afford to let political enthusiasm override economic and practical considerations. 

“If politicians are serious about nuclear, let’s see the full breakdown of costs, risks and alternatives before making any decisions.”

AFAE warns against locking into costly or uncertain energy options and calls for a transparent review of nuclear power in Australia before any site is considered for waste storage.

 


Contact details:

Jo Dodds: +61 428 399 871, [email protected]

More from this category

  • Business Company News, Energy
  • 21/03/2026
  • 13:25
Ecopha Biotech Pty Ltd

Ecopha Files World-First Patent Turning One Crop into Two Trillion-Dollar Industries

Key Facts: Ecopha Biotech has filed a world-first international (PCT) patent for a dual-production process combining fuel and materials The technology converts Pongamia oil…

  • Contains:
  • Environment, Government Federal
  • 20/03/2026
  • 14:33
The Climate Council

Gas decision leaves Aussies exposed to more price hikes

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEFRIDAY 20 MARCH, 2026 TheAlbanese Government has just approved a new gas export project, leaving Australians highly exposed to volatile international markets and rising costs of living. The project is approved until 2081 – more than three decades after Australia plans to finish its switch to clean energy – and brings the Albanese Government’s tally of new climate-polluting projects to 36 coal, oil and gas projects approved since 2022. Climate Councillor Greg Bourne said: “Digging up and exporting more gas directly exposes Australians to price hikes driven by global conflict, as we're seeing play out right now. Since…

  • Government Federal, Oil Mining Resources
  • 20/03/2026
  • 11:27
Greenpeace Australia Pacific

‘No more war profits for Big Gas’: Greenpeace backs Government signal on taxing gas corporations

Greenpeace Australia Pacific has welcomed reports that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s department is considering options to tax the profits gas companies are making from the war in the Middle East, praising the move as strong leadership in a time of war, climate disruption and a cost‑of‑living crisis. DavidRitter, Chief Executive Officer at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:“The Albanese Government deserves due credit for standing up to gas corporations like Woodside and Santos as Australia faces a cost-of-living crisis, created by dependence on fossil fuels like gas. “For years, rent-seeking gas companies have used every geopolitical shock as an excuse to demand…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.