Skip to content
Energy, Government Federal

Before we decide where to dump nuclear waste, let’s answer the bigger questions

Australians for Affordable Energy 2 mins read

Australians for Affordable Energy is urging caution following calls for South Australia to become a nuclear power hub and waste storage site, warning fundamental questions about nuclear remain unanswered.

Alexander Downer’s comments advocating for nuclear power plants in South Australia and positioning the state as a nuclear waste storage site are deeply concerning given there has been no comprehensive discussion around nuclear power.

The nuclear debate must go beyond location discussion and first address economic and logistic concerns, Australians for Affordable Energy spokesperson Jo Dodds said. 

"Before we even talk about where to dump nuclear waste, we need to ask some hard questions. How much will nuclear really cost Australian taxpayers? What will it do to energy prices and the cost of living? How long will it take to build? Who funds insurance?” Ms Dodd said.

“There are global examples of nuclear projects that have blown out in cost and time frames and just fallen over, leaving consumers to foot the bill. Australians deserve transparency on these issues before any commitments are made.”

The practical implications of nuclear power for everyday Australians remain unclear. Australians deserve a full and open discussion of nuclear power's real impacts rather than ideological endorsements from political figures.

“We know nuclear energy requires massive upfront investment, long construction times, intensive oversight, expensive insurance, and creates long-term waste management challenges. These factors could seriously impact affordability -for the country and individuals who will have to pay the bills since private investment won't go near nuclear,” Ms Dodds said.

“We need an evidence-based national conversation about our energy future before committing to specific locations for waste storage. We can’t afford to let political enthusiasm override economic and practical considerations. 

“If politicians are serious about nuclear, let’s see the full breakdown of costs, risks and alternatives before making any decisions.”

AFAE warns against locking into costly or uncertain energy options and calls for a transparent review of nuclear power in Australia before any site is considered for waste storage.

 


Contact details:

Jo Dodds: +61 428 399 871, jo@afae.net.au

More from this category

  • Animal Animal WelfareRights, Government Federal
  • 25/03/2025
  • 07:05
Vets for Climate Action

Five Years After Black Summer: Vets gather at Canberra to demand stronger action on climate to protect animals

For Immediate Release OnThursday, 27 March 2025, Vets for Climate Action (VfCA) will host a critical event at Parliament House, Canberra. The gathering will spotlight the devastating effects climate pollution is having on animal health, biosecurity, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Veterinary professionals—trusted experts to business, government, farmers and families—will urge policymakers to take decisive action. Five years after the Black Summer Fires claimed three billion animal lives, Vets for Climate Action (VfCA) says more action is needed to cut climate pollution in the lead up to the Federal election. Since Black Summer, Australia has faced more unnatural disasters—fires, floods, and disease…

  • Energy
  • 24/03/2025
  • 17:07
Queensland Conservation Council

Updated: Nuclear power would steal agricultural and drinking water and require emergency storage for irradiated water

Sunday, 23 March 2025. Original release 19 March 2025 The Coalition’s proposed nuclear sites in Queensland would not have access to enough water to operate or manage a nuclear incident, according to an explosive new report by the Queensland Conservation Council. According to the Queensland Conservation Council, the proposed nuclear reactor in Callide would use more than double the water currently allocated to the existing Callide power station, while the proposed Tarong nuclear reactor would use 50 per cent more water than is allocated to the existing coal power station. We’ve just hit 14 years since the Fukushima nuclear accident.…

  • Contains:
  • Energy
  • 24/03/2025
  • 13:02
Friends of the Earth Australia

Big barrel at federal Parliament highlights big nuclear cost

As Australians look to Canberra ahead of Tuesday evenings federal Budget, the high cost of nuclear power will be illustrated by an eight metre high inflatable radioactive waste barrel on the grass in front of Parliament House. For multiple years CSIRO modelling has shown nuclear to be the most expensive and slowest electricity option in Australia. “The Coalition's nuclear push risks Australia’s economy, energy system and environment,” said Friends of the Earth national nuclear campaigner Dr Jim Green. “It is a threat to public health and a waste of public funds”. The barrel display is an initiative of nuclear free…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.