Skip to content
Political

Dump nuclear, restore momentum – new poll shows opportunity for Coalition

Liberals Against Nuclear 3 mins read

###RADIO NEWSROOMS, PLEASE NOTE: SOUNDBITES ATTACHED###

 

 

New polling shows the Liberal Party would increase its primary vote by 2.8 percentage points if it abandoned its nuclear energy policy, according to research commissioned by Liberals Against Nuclear.

 

Andrew Gregson, spokesperson for Liberals Against Nuclear, said the polling demonstrates that the same political flexibility recently shown by Peter Dutton on the work-from-home policy should be applied to the Coalition's nuclear energy plan.

 

"Peter Dutton has shown he can make hard-headed decisions when they're needed to win government. Our polling shows dumping nuclear would deliver an immediate 2.8% boost to the Liberal primary vote in key seats – potentially the difference between winning and losing this election," Mr Gregson said.

 

The uComms survey of 5,177 voters across 12 marginal electorates, including Liberal-held seats and those targeted for recovery from Labor and independents, found that 50.6% of undecided voters are less likely to vote for the Coalition because of its nuclear policy.

 

"What we've discovered is crystal clear – the people who like nuclear are already voting for us, and the policy is driving undecided voters away," Mr Gregson said.

 

"This follows the exact same pattern we saw with the work-from-home policy. When something is demonstrably unpopular with voters, there's no shame in changing course – in fact, it shows political maturity and a genuine commitment to winning government."

 

The polling also revealed that the nuclear policy disproportionately hurts the Liberal vote among women, with only 36.8% of female voters saying the policy makes them more likely to vote Coalition, compared to 52.4% of men.

 

"Just as Mr Dutton recognised that the work-from-home policy was hurting his standing with women voters, our polling shows that dropping nuclear would increase the Liberal vote among women by four percentage points," Mr Gregson said.

 

"The Coalition's backdown on forcing public servants back to the office full-time shows Mr Dutton can listen to voters and change direction when necessary. We're simply asking for that same political flexibility to be applied to a fiscally irresponsible nuclear policy that's proving even more unpopular."

 

Mr Gregson noted that 48% of respondents indicated they don't support nuclear power at all, with concerns about reducing investment in renewable energy (17.3%), nuclear waste management (14.6%), and high build costs (11.6%) topping the list of voter concerns.

"Our message to Liberal candidates is simple – even if you personally support nuclear energy, this polling shows dropping the policy gives you the best chance of winning your race. We're running out of time, but it's not too late to make this change and give the Coalition its best shot at forming government."

 

CONTACT: www.liberalsagainstnuclear.au [email protected]

Media

More from this category

  • Environment, Political
  • 16/12/2025
  • 15:53
Make Big Polluters Pay

Treasurer must levy big coal and gas corporations to fund climate disasters Make Big Polluters Pay

Climate disasters are projected to cost the federal budget $6.3 billion in the upcoming mid-year economic forecast this week. The Treasurer should follow public opinion and ensure coal and gas corporations responsible for most climate pollution pay for these costs, rather than forcing ordinary taxpayers to shoulder the burden, according to the Make Big Polluters Pay alliance. Climate disasters already cost the economy $38 billion each year, with households, communities, local governments and small businesses paying to recover from extreme weather. These impacts are also driving up insurance premiums, food prices and household bills. Deloitte projects disaster costs will exceed…

  • Contains:
  • Political, Property Real Estate
  • 16/12/2025
  • 06:00
Everybody's Home

The long list of trade-offs Aussies now make just to stay housed

Reducing energy use is the most common sacrifice Australians are making to afford their rent or mortgage, while many are limiting driving, skipping meals and delaying medical appointments, a new national survey has exposed.Everybody’s Home’s report‘Breaking Point’captures the results of a survey of more than 1,100 Australians. Of those surveyed: Half (50%) reduced their energy use including heating and cooling in the past year to cope with housing costs, making it the most common sacrifice Many respondents avoided the doctor or appointments (42%), reduced driving (38%), relied on credit cards or ‘buy now pay later’ (30%), skipped meals (28%) and…

  • Political
  • 15/12/2025
  • 09:25
Family First Party

Opera House sails should be lit in solidarity with Jewish community

Family First today urged the Minns Government to fight Australia’s on-going antisemitism crisis by lighting the Opera House sails with the star of David.…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.