Skip to content
Medical Health Aged Care

Global Review Identifies Best Treatments for Neuropathic Pain

Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) 3 mins read
  • A global research initiative has led to a revision of neuropathic pain treatment recommendations, considering new evidence and emerging technologies.
  • Up to 1 in 10 Australians have neuropathic pain – or nerve pain - caused by damage to nerves due to disease, surgery or trauma.
  • Three medication classes were recommended for first line use: alpha-2 delta ligands (e.g. gabapentin, pregabalin); serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (e.g. duloxetine); and tricyclic antidepressants (e.g. amitriptyline).
  • Patch and topical treatments were recommended as second-line treatments despite small benefits due to high safety and tolerability.
  • Evidence was inconclusive for spinal cord stimulation, and cannabis-based products were recommended against.

 

A major international study has provided the most comprehensive evidence to date on treatments for neuropathic pain – defined as pain caused by disease of the nervous system, affecting up to 10% of the population worldwide.

Doctoral researcher at the Centre for Pain IMPACT at Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), and the School of Health Sciences UNSW, Michael Ferraro, worked on the study by the International Association for the Study of Pain Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group.

“In Australia, up to 1 in 10 people live with neuropathic pain – these conditions, such as diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia and chemotherapy-induced nerve pain - severely impact quality of life and have a substantial social and economic burden,” Mr Ferraro said.

“There is an unmet need for effective and safe treatments for neuropathic pain. Our research looked at the evidence for all drugs and nerve stimulation treatments, considering effectiveness, safety, cost, accessibility, and patient perspectives.”

Published in the The Lancet Neurology, the systematic review and meta-analysis included data from 313 randomised controlled trials involving nearly 50,000 adult participants. The review evaluated both drug and nerve stimulation treatments and offers updated, evidence-based recommendations to guide effective management of neuropathic pain.

The good, the bad, the inconclusive

The research report made recommendations for first-, second- and third-line treatments.

“Three medication classes were recommended for first line use,” Mr Ferraro said. “These were alpha-2 delta ligands (e.g., pregabalin, gabapentin), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (e.g., duloxetine), and tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline). Importantly, these medicines have only modest benefits and require careful patient screening and close monitoring.”

“We also established capsaicin and lidocaine patches and capsaicin cream as second-line therapies despite small effects on pain - they are safe and tolerable, and suitable for use in older adults or patients taking multiple medications.”

The updated guideline provided, for the first time, recommendations for use of a non-invasive brain stimulation device, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, in selected patients.

For some treatments, evidence was inconclusive, whereas recommendations were made against others.

“We did not find sufficient evidence to recommend for or against use of several treatments including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g., escitalopram), NMDA receptor antagonists (e.g., ketamine), and implanted spinal cord stimulation,” Mr Ferraro said.

“We recommended against use of cannabis-based products as they were found to be ineffective.”

Patient-centred care required

“Neuropathic pain affects people differently, so the guideline supports the provision of high-quality patient-centred care, that considers needs, values and preferences,” Mr Ferraro said.

“Treatment choices depend on potential effectiveness, safety, accessibility, comorbidities, and use of other medicines.”

The International Association for the Study of Pain Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group first published its guidelines in 2007, with the last update published in 2015.  Mr Ferraro said future revisions may include a focus on other non-drug, non-surgical interventions.

“High-quality evidence on treatment of neuropathic pain with non-drug treatments, such as exercise, is lacking, and should be prioritised for future research,” he said.

The recommendations are intended for use by a broad range of health-care professionals, including physicians in specialist and primary care settings.

The full report is available here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Key Facts:

·      


About us:

About NeuRA

Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) is an independent, not-for-profit research institute based in Sydney aiming to prevent, treat and cure brain and nervous system diseases, disorders and injuries through medical research. To learn more about NeuRA: www.neura.edu.au


Contact details:

Katana Smith

Senior Media & PR Advisor
0452 140 477

[email protected]

Media

More from this category

  • Medical Health Aged Care
  • 18/12/2025
  • 22:11
BeOne Medicines Ltd.

BeOne Medicines Granted U.S. FDA Fast Track Designation for BGB-B2033 as Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BGB-B2033 is a bispecific antibody directed at GPC3 and 4-1BB; key targets in the most common liver cancer FDA Fast Track Designation reflects the…

  • Contains:
  • Medical Health Aged Care
  • 18/12/2025
  • 19:11
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited

Takeda’s Zasocitinib Landmark Phase 3 Plaque Psoriasis Data Show Promise to Deliver Clear Skin in a Once-Daily Pill, Catalyzing a New Era of Treatment

Pivotal Phase 3 studies of once-daily oral zasocitinib met all primary and ranked secondary endpoints in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis More than half…

  • Contains:
  • Medical Health Aged Care
  • 18/12/2025
  • 12:24
La Trobe University

Cell death discovery could aid cancer treatments

LaTrobe researchers have made a groundbreaking discovery about the way dying cells are cleared from our bodies, which could have important impacts on recovery from diseases including cancer infection and inflammatory diseases. Traditionally, it was believed dying cells were broken into smaller pieces by the cell’s own internal machinery, enabling the pieces to be more easily removed from the body. However the study, led by scientists at the La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science and Research Centre for Extracellular Vesicles found that the process of dying cell fragmentation is actually assisted by neighbouring cells. Published in Science Advances, the study…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.