Independent MP for Goldstein, Zoe Daniel, has called for a formal review of Australia’s AUKUS commitment, citing serious concerns about cost, delivery risks, and growing uncertainty over the United States’ reliability as a defence partner.
“Strategic autonomy isn’t just about submarines. It’s about having choices. Right now, Australia has only one plan – and it’s AUKUS. That’s not good enough,” Ms Daniel said.
She outlined five key reasons why a review must be a priority for the next parliament:
1. Alliances are under strain
The re-emergence of Donald Trump has already damaged Australia’s economy, with new tariffs impacting superannuation funds. His retreat from NATO’s collective defence agreement highlights that even long-standing alliances can no longer be taken for granted.
2. AUKUS is high-risk and high-cost
Australia has already contributed more than $800 million to the AUKUS program, yet there are no binding guarantees that the submarines will be delivered – or delivered on time. It is a significant investment with considerable uncertainty.
3. The U.S. may not deliver – and isn’t obligated to
Elbridge Colby – Donald Trump’s nominee for Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, and a key architect of U.S. strategic doctrine – has warned that selling submarines to Australia could weaken American military readiness.
“It would be crazy to have fewer Virginia-class submarines in the right place and time,” he said ahead of his nomination.
Colby also warned the Senate that U.S. sailors could be left “vulnerable” in a Taiwan conflict if submarines are diverted to allies. Under the AUKUS deal, the U.S. president can block any transfer if it’s deemed to reduce American capability – a condition experts say may never be met.
4. Australia has no Plan B
The Albanese government has conceded there is no alternative to AUKUS. In today’s increasingly precarious world, that level of dependency is a strategic risk in itself. Comments from the Opposition leader mirror the government’s view.
5. Even the UK is reassessing its position
Britain, a founding AUKUS partner, is currently reviewing its commitment considering shifting global dynamics. If it’s prudent for the UK to reassess, it is essential for Australia to do the same. At a very minimum, a health check on this deal is needed.
Ms Daniel said a review of AUKUS should be among the first orders of business for the next parliament and called for a mature national conversation on tax reform and revenue, noting that true strategic independence may require greater investment in defence.
“If we’re serious about national security, we must be honest with Australians about what it will cost – and how we’re going to pay for it.”
ENDS
Contact details:
Angela Pippos - 0417 298 742
Email - [email protected]
