Skip to content
Defence, Legal

Monash Expert: The legal case for US involvement in Iran

Monash University 2 mins read

Monash Expert: The legal case for US involvement in Iran 

 

The US shocked the world on Sunday when they attacked three nuclear sites inside Iran.

 

Questions have been raised about the legality of these strikes, and whether they breached international law.

 

Available to comment:

 

Dr Monique Cormier, Senior Lecturer in the Monash University Faculty of Law. 

Contact details for written comments: [email protected]

Read more of Dr Cormier’s commentary on Monash Lens.

  • International law and the right for a state to use force

  • Israel’s claim on Iran’s nuclear program

  • Legal case for US involvement in Iran

 

The following can be attributed to Dr Cormier:

 

“Under international law, a state traditionally has the right to use force in self-defence where it has been the subject of an armed attack. There is a limited extension of this right to situations in which the state using force in self-defence has not yet been attacked, but anticipates that a foreign attack is ‘instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means, and no moment for deliberation’. Any use of force in self-defence must be both necessary and proportionate.

 

“Israel is claiming that Iran’s nuclear program represents an existential threat and so the Israeli strikes on Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure was necessary as a self-defence measure. Reports vary as to how close Iran is to developing a nuclear weapon, but it appears that any threat to Israel was not so imminent as to leave no choice of alternative methods to deal with the situation. 

 

“This means that it is difficult to argue that Israel's strikes against Iran were necessary under the legal definition of self-defence. 

 

“It is also very difficult to make a legal case for the US's actions in Iran. International law recognises a right of collective self-defence, allowing other states to assist the state that is under attack, if requested. 

 

“However, because Israel's own legal claim to self-defence is highly dubious, there is no real foundation on which the US can base a claim of collective self-defence.”

 

For more Monash media stories visit our news and events site: monash.edu/news

For any other topics on which you may be seeking expert comment, contact the Monash University Media Unit on +61 3 9903 4840 or [email protected].

More from this category

  • Environment, Legal
  • 07/08/2026
  • 12:46
Climate Defenders Australia

UPDATED – Police drop all remaining 2024 Rising Tide coal protest cases after failed prosecutions

7 August 2026 Update: The court has now completed the mentions and all the charges have been officially dropped New South Wales Police have…

  • Contains:
  • Environment, Legal
  • 07/08/2026
  • 06:00
Climate Defenders Australia

Police will drop all remaining 2024 Rising Tide coal protest cases after failed prosecutions

7 August 2026 New South Wales Police will drop the remaining charges arising from Rising Tide's 2024 People's Blockade protest, where hundreds of people entered the water at Newcastle Harbour - the site of the world’s largest coal port - to protest coal export and its contribution to climate change. It comes after Climate Defenders Australia, who represented 117 of the arrestees, repeatedly petitioned Police to withdraw anti-protest charges after they failed to prosecute test cases, and were required to pay $73,000 in costs. Arrestee Susan Duncan, an ecologist who lost five friends on Black Saturday, said: “I feel that…

  • Contains:
  • Government VIC, Legal
  • 06/08/2026
  • 15:37
Jesuit Social Services

Weakening prisoners’ rights sets a dangerous precedent for every Victorian in custody

Key Facts: The Victorian Government is proposing amendments to the Corrections Act which remove the right of prisoners to one hour of time in the open air each day.This will weakens the legal minimum standards for people in custody, and breach the United Nations Mandela Rules and Victoria’s own Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities. Extended periods of solitary confinement can have extremely serious physical and psychological consequences. This also risks undermining rehabilitation and reintegration into the community.The Victorian Government must withdraw the Corrections Amendment Bill 2026, which removes the right of prisoners to one hour of time in the…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.