Skip to content
Environment, Government Federal

New analysis: Australia can power past 70% and should aim to reach net zero sooner

The Climate Council 3 mins read

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
THURSDAY 18 SEPTEMBER, 2025

NEW ANALYSIS from the Climate Council shows that powering past 70% by 2035 will mean we should reach net zero sooner, protect Australians from worsening climate impacts and deliver major economic benefits.


Climate Council Analysis:

  1. If we cut climate pollution by 70% by 2035 and maintained this rate of progress we would reach net zero by 2040. This linear trajectory would reduce Australia’s climate pollution by 1,409 million tonnes by 2050, a significant contribution to reducing the severity of climate impacts.
  2. Achieving a stronger target of 70% and above would unlock investment and greater economic growth, with modelling by Deloitte Access Economics indicating that a 75% target would result in a $227 billion increase in GDP over the next decade, relative to a weaker 65% target.
  3. The Government’s 2035 climate target could have gone further given that independent modelling1 consistently finds we can cut climate pollution by at least 75% by 2035.
  4. Compared to a 62% target, achieving a 70% target by 2035 could reduce Australia’s climate pollution by 490 million tonnes by 2050, equivalent to the annual climate pollution from 213 million cars.
  5. Under a 62% target, Australia’s climate pollution intensity will still be amongst the highest in the world, and almost double the current emissions per person globally2. This would be higher than nations in Europe and Asia, far exceed many developing nations, and exposes Australians to higher climate risks. 
  6. The government’s lack of action on fossil fuels undermines our ability to meet our target. Every new coal or gas project adds to our domestic pollution making it more difficult to meet our target. We estimate that its 31 approvals to date have weakened the 2035 target by at least 1.6%. If Australia keeps approving fossil fuel projects it undermines the global goal of keeping well heating below 2ºC, and potentially breaches international law

1Four independent pathways published by Climate Analytics, Climate Council, the CSIRO and Climateworks
2 Excluding LULUCF for comparability of 2035 targets


Climate Council CEO Amanda McKenzie said: “Our government must do more to protect Australians from worsening floods, fires and heatwaves. Scientists, emergency leaders, businesses and community groups have all been calling for a stronger 2035 target over 75% because the risks we face – from escalating extreme weather to spiralling costs – are so severe.”

“Today the Government has put forward a large target range. A 62% reduction is dangerously inadequate and inconsistent with the science, while a 70% cut is closer to what’s needed to protect Australians.

“Cuts stronger than 70% are not only achievable but hugely beneficial. They mean cleaner, more affordable electricity, healthier homes, cleaner cities and new export industries. To better protect Australians the government must lock in policies that ensure we meet, and then beat the 70% target.”

Climate Scientist, Dr Martin Rice said: “Climate change is harming Australians right now and communities are already suffering through back-to-back flooding, longer bushfire seasons and unbearable heatwaves. Climate scientists are certain that the longer we delay cuts to climate pollution, the harder it becomes to protect communities from escalating harm and costs.

“Any way you look at it, Australia is a major polluter and we have no plans to phase this damaging fossil fuel industry out. The science is clear: we can have no new coal, oil or gas expansion anywhere, to have any chance of avoiding the worst climate impacts.

“A target in the 60s is too weak to protect Australians and our way of life. In the face of catastrophic risks, it is just too timid for the times. The Government must double down on the top end of their target 70% and put policies in place to go further.”

Climate Councillor Greg Bourne said: “Australians expect decisive action and the Albanese Government has the mandate to deliver it. The 70% target should become a floor, not a ceiling – and the Government can not only deliver this but also power past it: by strengthening existing policies and adding new ones.

"Independent research has found that targets much stronger than 70% for Australia can be achieved and this will deliver significant benefits: cleaner and more affordable electricity, healthier homes, cleaner cities and new export industries."

“The pathway is clear: build a bigger renewable-powered grid, stop approving coal and gas projects, strengthen rules for big polluters and clean up transport. That’s how we tackle climate change and grow a stronger economy.”

The Climate Council says the Federal Government should lock this target into law with regular reviews to strengthen it as technology develops.


About us:

The Climate Council is Australia’s leading community-funded climate change communications organisation. We provide authoritative, expert and evidence-based advice on climate change to journalists, policymakers, and the wider Australian community.

For further information, go to: climatecouncil.org.au
Or follow us on social media: LinkedInFacebookX


Contact details:

For interviews please contact the Climate Council media team on [email protected] or call 0485 863 063.

More from this category

  • Environment
  • 20/12/2025
  • 00:41
Ant International

New York Liberty and Ant International’s Alipay+ Announce Multiyear Partnership Focused on Empowerment, Sustainability and Youth Development

Ant International’s Alipay+ Named an Official Sponsor and Innovation Partner for Sustainability of the Team NEW YORK & SINGAPORE–BUSINESS WIRE– The New York Liberty…

  • Contains:
  • Environment, Transport Automotive
  • 19/12/2025
  • 15:30
NALSPA

Critical gaps in Productivity Commission’s assessment of EV tax incentive

Statement from the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association (NALSPA) chief executive Rohan Martin responding to the Productivity Commission’s final report ‘Investing in cheaper, cleaner energy and the net zero transformation’: “It’s disappointing to see the Productivity Commission overlook the benefits of the FBT exemption for electric vehicles. We reject their recommendation outright. This is a policy that is demonstrably effective and is working exactly as the Parliament intended in driving EV uptake. “Without the FBT exemption we would have far fewer new and second-hand EVs on Australian roads. Significant barriers to EV adoption remain, but for thousands of…

  • Environment
  • 19/12/2025
  • 13:44
19 December 2025

Experts available to respond to Productivity Commission report

Climateworks Centreexperts are available to comment on the Australian Government's Productivity Commission report 'Investing in cheaper, cleaner energy and the net zero transformation.' Dr Portia Odell, Cities System Lead ‘Without further action Australia’s transport sector will be the largest source of emissions by 2030 based on the Australian government’s latest emissions projections. A bigger-picture approach including strong EV uptake and decarbonisation for heavy vehicles, and investment in public and active transport will give Australians more choices in how they move.' 'While the Productivity Commission didn’t make a specific recommendation around road user charging in this report, it rightly notes that…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.