Skip to content
Political

Telfer award nomination an insult to children and families devasted by gender fluid ideology

Family First Party 2 mins read

Statement by Family First National Director LYLE SHELTON

 

Family First condemns the Australian Human Rights Commission’s decision to nominate Dr Michelle Telfer for a Human Rights Medal.


This is an insult to every Australian child harmed, and every family devastated, by the experimental “gender-affirming” medical model that Dr Telfer has championed.


The model of rushing confused young people toward puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries has now been thoroughly discredited by the landmark UK Cass Review.


That exhaustive, evidence-based report found there was “remarkably weak evidence” for medicalised gender treatment in minors and warned that the practice had caused “significant harm” to vulnerable children.


The Cass Review’s findings have led to the closure of the Tavistock Clinic and the banning of puberty blockers for minors in the United Kingdom.


Yet here in Australia, the very doctor whose activism helped embed this failed model into our health system is being celebrated as a “human rights” hero. This turns the concept of human rights on its head.

 

She is also the author of the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, which are based on the discredited World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) guidelines.

 

Dr Telfer’s child gender clinic at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne has been caught out referring girls under 18 for double mastectomies.

 

Dr Telfer’s credibility has also been questioned by the courts. In a tragic Family Court case concerning a gender-distressed 12-year-old boy, Justice Andrew Strum described Dr Telfer’s evidence as “misleading”, later declaring it was in the public interest to lift a suppression order so she could be named.

 

For the Human Rights Commission to honour a figure whose testimony has been called into question by the Family Court, and whose model of care has been condemned by one of the world’s most comprehensive medical reviews, is an extraordinary act of ideological blindness.

 

The Human Rights Commission’s decision shows just how captured our taxpayer-funded bureaucracy has become by radical LGBTIQ gender theory.

 

Powerful taxpayer-funded bodies like the AHRC put pressure on mainstream families who want their children protected from radical LGBTIQA+ gender fluid ideology.

 

This has not been a good week for the AHRC with its Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody siding with biological males over girls’ and women’s sex-based rights.

 

Cody, who is paid $400,000 per year, told a Senate hearing she did not know what a biological male was.

 

Family First renews its calls for the AHRC to be abolished along with its state-based counterparts.

 

Family First candidates Deepa Mathew (SA), Bernie Finn and Jane Foreman (VIC), and Lyle Shelton (NSW) are standing at up-coming state elections to take the pressure off families by fighting this ideological nonsense until every Australian family is safe from it.

 

 


Contact details:

[email protected]

Media

More from this category

  • Environment, Political
  • 15/11/2025
  • 04:24
Greenpeace Australia Pacific

Actionable outcome, not a ‘roadmap to nowhere’, needed at COP30

BELÉM, BRAZIL, Friday 14 November 2025 — In response to calls for a fossil fuel phase-out roadmap at COP30, Dr Simon Bradshaw, COP31 Lead at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “Phasing out fossil fuels is fundamental to protecting everything we love and depend upon. Without real action on this front, we will soar past 1.5°C of warming, with catastrophic consequences for Australia, the Pacific, and the world at large. “Here in Belém at COP30, governments have the opportunity to kickstart the development of a real action plan for the managed phase out of fossil fuels and rapid transition to renewable energy.…

  • Finance Investment, Political
  • 14/11/2025
  • 11:43
Super Members Council

SMC urges stronger protections to prevent consumer harm in high-risk super switches

The Super Members Council (SMC) is calling for stronger protections to prevent consumer harm in high-risk super switching to avoid a repeat of what ASIC has described as a "catastrophe”. It is clear additional consumer safeguards are needed to protect Australians’ super savings - and SMC seeks to work with other system stakeholders in good faith to design stronger consumer safety protections. The First Guardian and Shield collapses have laid bare the scale of serious consumer risks when Australians are urged to switch their super out of the high-performing mainstream super system – where there are strong consumer protections and…

  • Contains:
  • Political
  • 14/11/2025
  • 11:26
Unions NSW

Upper house demands meaningful workers comp reform

The State Government’s attempt to slash weekly support payments to traumatised workers has been sent packing by the Upper House, prompting fresh union calls to put dignity and compassion at the heart of any further reform efforts. An attempt to to hike the whole person impairment threshold at which a psychologically injured worker receives weekly income support from 15% to 28 per cent by 2029 was rejected in the early hours of this morning. “The parliament has reflected the views of the community. It has told the Government to put away its sledgehammer and rediscover compassion and dignity for traumatised…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.