Skip to content
Political

Dr Monique Ryan highlights concerns about the Government’s rushed Hate Speech and Migration Laws

Dr Monique Ryan, Independent Member for Kooyong 2 mins read

Following passage of the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Bill 2026, Independent Member for Kooyong, Dr. Monique Ryan, said today:  

“After the Bondi tragedy, it was critical that our Parliament united behind laws to protect Australians from gun violence and hate speech. Our communities – particularly the Australian Jewish community – have been shocked and traumatised by that senseless act of violence. They want us to take action to ensure their safety and their freedom. But I have serious concerns about this legislation. 

"Australians want us to get this right. Poor policymaking won’t make our constituents safer. Terrorism isn’t only an attack on lives; it’s also an attack on our confidence in the idea that democracies can remain both secure and free. Legislation on the run will not engender confidence in our processes or our government.      

“Members of Parliament saw this legislation only three hours before it was put to a vote.The concern expressed by many in the Kooyong community – supported by the Parliamentary report released only this morning - is that the broad application of many of this bill’s provisions could have a chilling effect on legitimate debate on political, social and religious issues. The speed with which the legislation has been developed means that legal inconsistencies and unintended consequences seem inevitable.  

“The Bill includes measures I support. Laws that impose tougher penalties on hate crimes, constraints on hate groups, and aggravated offences for community leaders who choose to incite violence are improvements that will protect all Australians.  

"What we didn’t do today was act to protect all Australians from serious vilification based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other characteristics. Hatred does not discriminate on those characteristics; neither should the law. The need for these protections was agreed on by leaders of the Jewish community, Human Rights Commission, and Equality Australia. The removal of racial vilification elements from this legislation renders it less likely to be effective in its aim of banning hate groups. We need to revisit this issue as we see results from the Royal Commission. I moved an amendment today seeking better reporting of hate crimes and the outcome of their prosecution. We must revisit these issues at intervals to be sure that the legislation is effective.

“If Bondi becomes another episode of finger-pointing and blame, followed by forgetfulness, we will have failed this country. If instead it becomes a catalyst for serious, evidence-based reform, Australia will emerge from it stronger and better.


Contact details:

Rosie Leon-Thomas 
0455 657 546 
[email protected] 

More from this category

  • Government Federal, Political
  • 20/01/2026
  • 10:27
Charles Darwin University

CDU EXPERT: Hate speech laws must be ‘robust’ and ‘restrained’, forensic linguist urges

TUESDAY JANUARY 20 2026 Who: Charles Darwin University (CDU) forensic linguist and legal discourse analyst Dr Awni Etaywe, who has lodged a formal expert submission to the Australian Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security as part of its inquiry into the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026. Topics: Dr Etaywe’s submission, A Forensic and Legal Linguistic Perspective: Review of the Exposure Draft Legislation – Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026, examines how key terms in the Bill, such as fear, hatred, and leadership operate linguistically and legally in shaping criminal liability. The submission focuses on the Bill’s…

  • Finance Investment, Political
  • 20/01/2026
  • 06:01
Super Members Council

Busting a myth: Australians not underspending their super

A major report from the Super Members Council dispels a persistent myth that most Australian retirees are underspending their super, reviewing more recent data on retiree super behaviour patterns and finding that drawdowns from super are now typically higher than the minimum amounts required. In 2024–25, around 68% of tax-free retirement account holders withdrew above the minimum, with this proportion even higher for those with less than $50,000 in super (81%). Withdrawal rates vary with age. Super drawdown rates are highest for retirees aged 65-69 across both working life super accounts and retirement super accounts, falling as retirees enter their…

  • Contains:
  • CharitiesAidWelfare, Political
  • 19/01/2026
  • 11:01
Oxfam Australia

Average Australian billionaire wealth grew by over half a million dollars a day in the last year: Oxfam

New report calls for taxing the super-rich to tackle rampant inequality Average Australian billionaires' wealth grew by almost $600,000 a day in the last year alone, or over $10.5 billion collectively, new Oxfam analysis reveals today as the World Economic Forum opens in Davos. Since 2020, eight new Australian billionaires have been minted. Today, Australia’s 48 billionaires hold more wealth than the bottom 40% of the population combined, almost 11 million people. In light of these eye-watering figures, the anti-poverty organisation is calling the Australian Government to tax the fortunes of the super-rich to tackle rampant inequality. Data crunching also…

  • Contains:

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.