Skip to content
Animal Animal WelfareRights, Medical Health Aged Care

Parliamentary petition urges equal protections for all primates used in research

Animal-Free Science Advocacy (AFSA) 3 mins read
Key Facts:

AFSA is calling for public support for Australian Parliament e-petition EN8985 to extend stronger ethical protections to all non-human primates used in research, not just great apes

AFSA has briefed all Federal MPs and Senators and submitted the same briefing to the NHMRC as part of the current review of the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes.

AFSA’s recommendations include extending protections to all non-human primates, stopping approval of new primate research projects, and ending NHMRC funding for new primate research from 2028, while prioritising non-animal methods

See Ending Primate Experiments - Animal-Free Science Advocacy


Animal-Free Science Advocacy (AFSA) is calling on the public to support Australian Parliament e-petition EN8985, titled “Allow Primates in Research the Same Protections as Great Apes.” The petition is listed on the Australian Parliament e-petitions website and seeks to extend stronger ethical protections to all non-human primates used in research.

A mobile billboard has highlighted the plight of primates and the urgent opportunity for reform in Melbourne and Gippsland, home to primate research and breeding institutions.

AFSA has now provided a formal briefing to every Federal Member of Parliament and Senator, outlining the scientific, ethical and policy case for extending the special protections currently afforded to great apes to all non-human primates under Australia’s research framework.

The briefing has also been submitted to the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) as part of its current review of the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes.

Named contributors in support of equal protections for all primates include leading experts in science, ethics and animal welfare.

Professor Andrew Knight, a world-leading animal welfare expert, states that limiting protections to great apes is “ethically inconsistent,” noting that the morally relevant characteristics used to justify great ape protections are “not unique to great apes.”

Geneticist Dr Jarrod Bailey further states that monkeys are “cognitively and emotionally advanced, and highly sentient,” and supports amending the NHMRC primate guidelines, describing extended protections as “a positive step according to animal ethics, good science, and human ethics.”

AFSA argues that many non-human primates, including macaques, baboons and marmosets, possess complex cognitive, emotional and social capacities, making their exclusion from heightened protections scientifically and ethically indefensible.

Crucially, these animals are subjected to highly invasive experiments, including surgical procedures, restraint, behavioural manipulation, and long-term confinement in laboratory environments — practices that cause significant psychological distress and suffering.

“Primate research is an outdated, unpopular and increasingly unscientific practice,” said Robyn Kirby Primate Campaign Consultant with Animal-Free Science. “The continued use of highly sentient primates in invasive research cannot be justified when modern, human-relevant and non-animal methods are rapidly advancing.”

Restricting special protections to great apes while permitting invasive experimentation on other primates is increasingly viewed as inconsistent with contemporary science, ethics and community expectations.

AFSA recommends that the NHMRC:

-amend the Code to extend special ethical protections to all non-human primates;

-prohibit approval of new non-human primate research projects while allowing approved projects to conclude and animals to be retired appropriately; and

-cease NHMRC funding for new non-human primate research from 2028 onwards, while prioritising non-animal methods.

These reforms would bring Australia in line with evolving international standards and reflect both scientific progress and strong public concern about the treatment of primates in laboratories.

AFSA is calling on members of the public to review and sign the petition, which closes on 4 March.


About us:

Animal-Free Science Advocacy is a not-for-profit organisation advocating for the replacement of animals in research and teaching in Australia with non-animal methods. 


Contact details:

Robyn Kirby

Primate Campaign Consultant AFSA

[email protected]

0466 234 526

Media

More from this category

  • Medical Health Aged Care
  • 20/03/2026
  • 09:20
Monash University

Clinical trial could help patients at risk of hidden cardiovascular leg disease

A medication commonly used to treat gout could be the key to reducing a cardiovascular condition that puts one in five people aged over 75 at risk of devastating complications like leg ulcers, gangrene and amputation. Monash University and Eastern Health are examining the use of the anti-inflammatory drug Colchicine to prevent peripheral artery disease (PAD) as part of the international LEADER-PAD clinical trial. PAD occurs when the arteries that deliver blood to the legs narrow as a result of atherosclerosis, a chronic condition that blocks arteries. A key contributor to the condition is inflammation, so it is hoped that…

  • Medical Health Aged Care
  • 20/03/2026
  • 08:21
Royal Australian College of GPs

‘The start Canberra needs to grow its GP workforce’: 26% more GPs to train in the ACT

Canberra has welcomed a record number of future specialist GPs participating in the Commonwealth-funded Australian GP Training (AGPT) Program with the Royal Australian College of GPs (RACGP). In 2026, 29 future GPs have commenced training in the ACT, 26% more than in 2025. Meanwhile, a further 18 eligible doctors applied to train as GPs, indicating with more support for GP supervisors and more Commonwealth-funded AGPT places, the RACGP can train more specialist GPs in Canberra. RACGP NSW&ACT Chair Dr Rebekah Hoffman said the increase is a promising start, and one to build on. “It’s a win, and it’s the start…

  • Contains:
  • Medical Health Aged Care, Sport Recreation
  • 20/03/2026
  • 06:30
UNSW Sydney

Waves, wipeouts and collisions: when surfers injure others

As surfing grows in popularity, crowded lineups are creating more opportunities for collisions – and in some cases, conflict between surfers in the water. More than one in 10 Australian surfers say they have injured someone else while surfing, according to new research fromUNSW’s Beach Safety Research Group that sheds light on an under-recognised risk in crowded surf breaks. The study, published today in the journal Injury Prevention, found that 93 out of 815 Australian surfers surveyed – or 11.4% – said they had injured another person in the water at some point while surfing. Most injuries were accidental, but…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.