Skip to content
Insurance

Insurers urged to be transparent about premium costs

General Insurance Code Governance Committee 2 mins read

The General Insurance Code Governance Committee (GICGC) has called on insurers to meet their commitments to transparency with customers regarding the cost of insurance premiums.

In its report published today, Clear costs at renewal: payment options and pricing transparency, the GICGC found that some insurers are not giving customers clear and accessible information about whether paying monthly, fortnightly or quarterly will cost more overall than paying annually.

Chair of the GICGC Veronique Ingram said insurers needed to be clear with customers about the actual cost of each payment option.

“When an insurer charges different amounts depending on how a customer pays, the insurer should clearly disclose the differences,” Ms Ingram said.

“Customers should be able to easily see, at renewal, whether one payment option will cost more than another. That is basic price transparency.”

The GICGC found many insurers were already meeting this expectation by clearly explaining the difference where one applied. It also noted that some of the insurers it reviewed do not charge more for paying by instalments.

Ms Ingram said that a lack of price transparency by any insurer cannot be justified.

“Many insurers are already doing the right thing,” Ms Ingram said.

“Some do not charge customers more to pay by instalments at all. Others do charge more but are upfront about the difference. In that context, it is unacceptable for any insurer to leave customers without clear information about what they will pay.”

The report found some renewal notices used vague statements that annual payment “may” be cheaper or told customers that instalment fees “may” apply, without clearly setting out the cost difference.

The GICGC said the issue affected a significant number of customers, with some products reviewed having half or more customers paying by monthly or fortnightly instalments – customers who need clear information when making decisions about household expenses.

Ms Ingram highlighted the importance of transparency for customers deciding whether to continue their cover and how to manage the cost of their premium.

“This is not about telling insurers what pricing model they can use,” she said.

“But if an insurer chooses to charge different amounts for different payment options, it must be open and transparent about the implications of that choice. Customers are entitled to clear and accessible information before they make a decision.”

The General Insurance Code Governance Committee will continue to monitor insurer practices and may consider further action if insurers do not adopt sufficiently transparent pricing practices.

Read the report.


About us:

The General Insurance Code Governance Committee is an independent body that monitors and enforces insurers’ compliance with the Code of Practice.


Contact details:

[email protected]

More from this category

  • Insurance
  • 26/06/2026
  • 08:51
Life Code Compliance Committee

New member to join Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee

The Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee (Life CCC)welcomesthe appointment of Ms Anna Meulman as its new ConsumerMember. Ms Meulman will join theLife CCCfrom 1 July 2026, bringing significant experience in consumer law, financial services, complaints handling and advocacy for vulnerable consumers. Currentlya Managing Lawyer at Consumer Action Law Centre,Ms Meulmanoversees the consumer and financial services work of a team of lawyers assisting individuals and community workers across Victoria. Life CCCChairJan McClellandAMwelcomed Ms Meulman’s appointment and said her experience would bring valuable insight to the Committee’s work. “Anna brings a strong understanding of the issues affecting consumers, including vulnerable consumers, in…

  • Insurance
  • 22/06/2026
  • 11:15
Life Code Compliance Committee

Insurer sanctioned over claim handling delays

The Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee (LifeCCC) has sanctioned a life insurer for failures in claims handling that led to significant delays for customers waiting on decisions. The insurer did not request information from claimants at the earliest available opportunities, as required by the Life Insurance Code of Practice. The failures occurred between July 2023 and May 2025 and resulted in 358 breaches of the Code. Some customers experienced delays of more than eight months on their claims, with the insurer later paying a combined total of $160,000 in interest to 101 eligible customers affected. Chair of the Life CCC,…

  • Insurance
  • 16/06/2026
  • 11:25
Insurance Brokers Code Compliance Committee

Brokers urged to strengthen renewal processes

The Insurance Brokers Code Compliance Committee (IBCCC) has called on insurance brokers to strengthen their renewal processes after its latest data report found renewal timeframes remained the most significant area of non-compliance. In its 2025 Annual Data Report published today, the IBCCC shows that late or missed renewal engagement continues to be a major issue for brokers, with the potential to affect clients when they are making important decisions about their insurance cover. Chair of the IBCCC Oscar Shub said renewal was a critical point in the broker-client relationship. “Clients need enough time before renewal to consider their options, understand…

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.