Skip to content
National News Current Affairs, Political

Will AUKUS keep us safe – at what cost?

AUKUS Public Inquiry 3 mins read

Media Release

 

2 June 2026

Canberra

 

Will AUKUS keep us safe – at what cost?

 

For the first time, the Australian community will have the opportunity to investigate the controversial and secretive AUKUS defence pact. Today, five esteemed Australians will launch a nationwide Public Inquiry into AUKUS at Parliament House, Canberra. From diverse backgrounds and disciplines, but united in their commitment to transparency, democracy and the defence of Australia, Peter Garrett, Carmen Lawrence, Chris Barrie, Leanne Minshull and Karina Lester will head the public inquiry into AUKUS beginning today. Full Commissioner profiles can be viewed here.

 

There has never been a more critical time to get the truth about AUKUS and what it means for our nation. The Federal Government is planning to spend $368 billion-plus of our taxes on nuclear-powered submarines -  the largest defence spend in our history — without answers to basic questions such as: will Australia receive the submarines were paying for on time and on budget; where will the high-level nuclear waste generated by the subs be stored; how many Australian jobs will be created and at what cost, and crucially, will this project keep us safe — or turn us into a nuclear target?

 

Lead Commissioner Peter Garrett said,

 AUKUS is by far the most expensive and complex undertaking ever entered into by any Australian Government and yet the opportunity to question, debate and decide has been taken out of the hands of the parliament and the people. A Public Inquiry into this massive spend of taxpayer’s money is long overdue.”


Commissioner Admiral (Retd) Chris Barrie AC said,

 As Chief of the Defence Force in the late 90s and early 2000s, I investigated the proposition of acquiring nuclear powered submarines for Australia but there was little interest in it then and we all need to know why suddenly, there is huge interest, secrecy and money available for the AUKUS submarines today. Thats what this Inquiry is for.”

 

Commissioner Dr Carmen Lawrence said,

 A basic requirement of any functioning democracy is transparency from our Government. It is simply not credible that the Federal Government can take nearly $400 billion from the Australian people, make private deals with US and UK technology companies and foreign governments to access the Australian mainland and our data, and then tell us not to ask questions. Australians would never accept that, and nor should we. Thats why this Inquiry is vital.”

 

 

Yankunytjatjara woman and Commissioner Karina Lester said.

“For decades Aboriginal people of this country have had nuclear weapons tested on our traditional lands, we have been pressured to be the solution to nuclear waste. Our traditional lands have been mined on and our communities continually pressured by an industry that has harmed us for generations. What is Australia's plan to manage the nuclear waste under this AUKUS Agreement? Will Australia be taking in nuclear waste from the UK and the US under this agreement? We fear it will be our mobs and our countries that is expected to take it. And once again, no one has bothered to talk to us. We have the lived experience and that's why First Nations voices are crucial to this Public Inquiry.”

 

Commissioner Leanne Minshull said,

 The projected cost of $368 billion for AUKUS is hard to conceptualise. Think about Australias biggest wealth fund, set up in 2006. After 20 years of squirreling away money and banking investment returns, the future fund is now worth $337 billion. The cost of AUKUS would wipe out these generational savings and then some. If we are to spend the equivalent of our national savings, on a single project, the benefit needs to be clear and overwhelming.  What wont we be able to fund? How many jobs will be created from this project? Where will those jobs be? In a tight labour market, how will those jobs be filled? Will they divert skills from other national priorities like building residential homes? Will these jobs be the worst targeted, most expensive in Australian history?”

 

This nation-wide inquiry into AUKUS will seek answers to a number of critical questions.  The Terms of Reference can be found here and the website here. The Inquiry will be taking written submissions and conducting hearings across Australia.

 

AUKUS Public Inquiry media contacts: 

Phil Davey 0414 867 188, [email protected]  

Julie Macken 0400 925 217

 

Notes to Editor

Primary Questions of the Public Inquiry

 

1.Cost & Fiscal Impact: Is the $368 billion+ price tag accurate? What is the opportunity cost to healthcare, education, climate action, and closing the gap?

2.Strategic Rationale: Does AUKUS genuinely enhance Australian security, or does it increase our exposure to great-power conflict with China?

3.Sovereignty & Independence: Is AUKUS locking Australia further into the US war machine at the expense of our independence as a middle power?

4.Nuclear Non-Proliferation: Does the transfer of nuclear technology set a dangerous precedent? Where will high-level nuclear waste be stored?

5.Environmental Consequences: What are the long-term environmental risks of operating nuclear-powered submarines in Australian waters?

6. Alternatives Considered: Were credible and less costly alternatives to AUKUS properly assessed before the decision was made in secret?


Contact details:

AUKUS Public Inquiry media contacts: 

Phil Davey 0414 867 188, [email protected]  

Julie Macken 0400 925 217

 

Media

Media Outreach made fast, easy, simple.

Feature your press release on Medianet's News Hub every time you distribute with Medianet. Pay per release or save with a subscription.